CBFV
Price
$28.63
Change
+$0.05 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
111.19M
47 days until earnings call
UNB
Price
$28.68
Change
-$0.11 (-0.38%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
137.84M
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs UNB

Header iconCBFV vs UNB Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs UNBBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$28.63
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
Volume$11.4K
Capitalization111.19M
Union Bankshares
Price$28.68
Change-$0.11 (-0.38%)
Volume$2.25K
Capitalization137.84M
CBFV vs UNB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. UNB commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a StrongBuy and UNB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $28.63 vs. UNB: $28.68)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and UNB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 76% vs. UNB: 21%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $111.19M vs. UNB: $137.84M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $111.19M. UNB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $137.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than UNB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UNB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than UNB.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.75% price change this week, while UNB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

UNB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNB($138M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($111M). UNB has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: UNB (12.33) vs CBFV (4.89). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 1.853 vs. UNB (1.368). CBFV has less debt than UNB: CBFV (34.7M) vs UNB (81.9M). UNB has higher revenues than CBFV: UNB (46.8M) vs CBFV (42.4M).
CBFVUNBCBFV / UNB
Capitalization111M138M80%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.8531.368135%
P/E Ratio4.8912.3340%
Revenue42.4M46.8M91%
Total CashN/A4.35M-
Total Debt34.7M81.9M42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs UNB: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
UNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8253
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3736
SMR RATING
1..100
1919
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
416
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (53) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNB (90). This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNB’s over the last 12 months.

UNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (37). This means that UNB’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

UNB's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (19). This means that UNB’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (60). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (16). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVUNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PWETX14.76N/A
N/A
PACE International Em Mkts Eq P2
HIBSX102.69N/A
N/A
Hartford Stock HLS IB
PFPWX52.95N/A
N/A
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
LFGTX38.20N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R5
IUSCX11.18N/A
N/A
FI Instl Group U.S. Small Cap Eq

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+0.17%
WSFS - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.33%
EBC - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
FIBK - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
UMBF - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
UBFO - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.61%
More

UNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNB has been loosely correlated with NIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNB jumps, then NIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNB
1D Price
Change %
UNB100%
-0.36%
NIC - UNB
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
CASH - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
RNST - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.15%
FXNC - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
CBFV - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
More