CBFV
Price
$32.02
Change
-$0.47 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jul 25, 01:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
111.19M
90 days until earnings call
UNB
Price
$27.99
Change
-$0.71 (-2.47%)
Updated
Jul 25, 01:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
137.84M
82 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs UNB

Header iconCBFV vs UNB Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs UNBBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$32.02
Change-$0.47 (-1.45%)
Volume$100
Capitalization111.19M
Union Bankshares
Price$27.99
Change-$0.71 (-2.47%)
Volume$100
Capitalization137.84M
CBFV vs UNB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. UNB commentary
Jul 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and UNB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $32.49 vs. UNB: $28.70)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and UNB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 225% vs. UNB: 102%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $111.19M vs. UNB: $137.84M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $111.19M. UNB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $137.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than UNB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than UNB.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +16.49% price change this week, while UNB (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

UNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNB($138M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($111M). UNB has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: UNB (12.33) vs CBFV (4.89). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 15.585 vs. UNB (1.421). CBFV has less debt than UNB: CBFV (34.7M) vs UNB (81.9M). UNB has higher revenues than CBFV: UNB (46.8M) vs CBFV (42.4M).
CBFVUNBCBFV / UNB
Capitalization111M138M80%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.5851.4211,097%
P/E Ratio4.8912.3340%
Revenue42.4M46.8M91%
Total CashN/A4.35M-
Total Debt34.7M81.9M42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs UNB: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
UNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3233
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1836
SMR RATING
1..100
5243
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
517
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (90). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (36). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

UNB's SMR Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (52). This means that UNB’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (60). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (17). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVUNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARGGY1.100.01
+0.46%
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc.
BYYLF0.37N/A
N/A
Balyo SA
DBMXF0.44N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA
EMBVF10.39N/A
N/A
Arca Continental SAB de CV
LFEV0.51-0.14
-21.54%
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings Inc.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+3.90%
SSB - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
UBFO - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
VBTX - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
EBC - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
PFIS - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.58%
More

UNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNB has been loosely correlated with CBFV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNB jumps, then CBFV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNB
1D Price
Change %
UNB100%
+2.90%
CBFV - UNB
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.90%
CFFI - UNB
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
RNST - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
FXNC - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
HBCP - UNB
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
More