CBFV
Price
$28.18
Change
+$0.50 (+1.81%)
Updated
Jun 27, 12:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
111.19M
27 days until earnings call
WSFS
Price
$55.61
Change
+$0.07 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jun 27, 01:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.71B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs WSFS

Header iconCBFV vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs WSFSBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$28.18
Change+$0.50 (+1.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization111.19M
WSFS Financial
Price$55.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.13%)
Volume$702
Capitalization2.71B
CBFV vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. WSFS commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and WSFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $27.68 vs. WSFS: $55.54)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 101% vs. WSFS: 77%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $111.19M vs. WSFS: $2.71B
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $111.19M. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the long-term than CBFV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the short-term than CBFV.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($2.71B) has a higher market cap than CBFV($111M). WSFS has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: WSFS (10.04) vs CBFV (4.89). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 5.132 vs. CBFV (-1.527). CBFV has less debt than WSFS: CBFV (34.7M) vs WSFS (895M). WSFS has higher revenues than CBFV: WSFS (1.02B) vs CBFV (42.4M).
CBFVWSFSCBFV / WSFS
Capitalization111M2.71B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.5275.132-30%
P/E Ratio4.8910.0449%
Revenue42.4M1.02B4%
Total CashN/A606M-
Total Debt34.7M895M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
848
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4335
SMR RATING
1..100
5212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
425
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (67) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (25) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUWCX31.49N/A
N/A
DWS Core Equity C
RAIIX27.83N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Rainier Intl Discv I
TAISX12.72N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq I
GMOIX29.97N/A
N/A
GMO International Equity III
JHJRX23.55N/A
N/A
JHancock ESG Large Cap Core R6

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+0.36%
WSFS - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
SHBI - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
FIBK - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
EBC - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
UBFO - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
+2.19%
UBSI - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
UCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
STBA - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
ABCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
SBCF - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
More