UCB
Price
$35.44
Change
+$0.15 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.24B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WSFS
Price
$80.20
Change
+$0.38 (+0.48%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

UCB vs WSFS

UCB vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UCB vs. WSFS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UCB is a Hold and WSFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (UCB: $35.44 vs. WSFS: $80.20)
Brand notoriety: UCB and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UCB: 81% vs. WSFS: 47%
Market capitalization -- UCB: $4.24B vs. WSFS: $4.12B
UCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.24B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UCB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • UCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the long-term than UCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UCB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • UCB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the short-term than UCB.

Price Growth

UCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

UCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UCB($4.24B) and WSFS($4.12B) have the same market capitalization . WSFS has higher P/E ratio than UCB: WSFS (13.46) vs UCB (11.58). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 45.962 vs. UCB (15.298). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. UCB (177M). UCB has less debt than WSFS: UCB (120M) vs WSFS (310M). WSFS (1.09B) and UCB (1.07B) have equivalent revenues.
UCBWSFSUCB / WSFS
Capitalization4.24B4.12B103%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.29845.96233%
P/E Ratio11.5813.4686%
Revenue1.07B1.09B98%
Total Cash177M1.69B10%
Total Debt120M310M39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UCB vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
UCB
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6393
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7932
SMR RATING
1..100
2932
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6936
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UCB's Valuation (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's SMR Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (32) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (69) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UCBWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNOV40.420.19
+0.47%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF Nov
TOAK28.980.03
+0.10%
Twin Oak Short Hrzn Abs Ret ETF
SIXH43.45-0.02
-0.05%
ETC 6 Meridian Hdg Eq-Idx Opt Strat ETF
AGGS40.25-0.11
-0.28%
Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF
DBEF54.95-0.35
-0.63%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF

UCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCB
1D Price
Change %
UCB100%
+0.43%
UBSI - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
CATY - UCB
89%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
AUB - UCB
89%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
FULT - UCB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
SFNC - UCB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More