Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHMX vs PFATX
CBHMX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHMX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income Member
Price$8.71
Change-$0.04 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$7.66
Change-$0.03 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets425.93M
CBHMX vs PFATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHMX vs. PFATX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHMX is a StrongBuy and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.59B vs. PFATX (426M). PFATX pays higher dividends than CBHMX: PFATX (5.23) vs CBHMX (4.14). CBHMX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHMX (5 years) vs PFATX (17 years). PFATX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CBHMX (0.73). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 443.00 vs. CBHMX (88.00). CBHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFATX: CBHMX (3000) vs PFATX (1000000). CBHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. PFATX (-2.89).
| CBHMX | PFATX | CBHMX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.33 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.33 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.800 | 2.228 | 260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 426M | 609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.14 | 5.23 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | -2.89 | -275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.56 | -2.33 | -195% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 5.64 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -6.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers