Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHMX vs PFATX
CBHMX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHMX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income Member
Price$8.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.7B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$7.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets406.23M
CBHMX vs PFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHMX vs. PFATX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHMX is a StrongBuy and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.7B vs. PFATX (406M). CBHMX pays higher dividends than PFATX: CBHMX (4.42) vs PFATX (4.06). CBHMX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHMX (5 years) vs PFATX (18 years). PFATX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CBHMX (0.73). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHMX (88.00). CBHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFATX: CBHMX (3000) vs PFATX (1000000). CBHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.07 vs. PFATX (0.30).
| CBHMX | PFATX | CBHMX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.751 | 4.355 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 406M | 665% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.42 | 4.06 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.07 | 0.30 | 2,379% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.73 | 4.02 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 15.03 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement