Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHMX vs PTFAX
CBHMX vs PTFAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHMX vs PTFAX
Victory Market Neutral Income Member
Price$8.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS A
Price$7.35
Change-$0.04 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets421.08M
CBHMX vs PTFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHMX vs. PTFAX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHMX is a StrongBuy and PTFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. PTFAX (421M). CBHMX pays higher dividends than PTFAX: CBHMX (4.45) vs PTFAX (3.83). CBHMX was incepted earlier than PTFAX: CBHMX (5 years) vs PTFAX (17 years). PTFAX (1.73) is less costly to investors than CBHMX (0.73). PTFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHMX (88.00). PTFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHMX: PTFAX (1000) vs CBHMX (3000). CBHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. PTFAX (-4.91).
| CBHMX | PTFAX | CBHMX / PTFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.73 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.73 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.196 | 1.947 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 421M | 630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.45 | 3.83 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | -4.91 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.49 | 3.59 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 7.35 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -8.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement