Ad is loading...
CBHMX vs PTFAX
CBHMX vs PTFAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHMX vs PTFAX
Victory Market Neutral Income Member
Price$8.51
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS A
Price$7.63
Change+$0.04 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets459.62M
CBHMX vs PTFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHMX vs. PTFAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHMX is a StrongBuy and PTFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.53B vs. PTFAX (460M). CBHMX pays higher dividends than PTFAX: CBHMX (4.52) vs PTFAX (2.73). CBHMX was incepted earlier than PTFAX: CBHMX (4 years) vs PTFAX (17 years). PTFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CBHMX (87.00). PTFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHMX: PTFAX (1000) vs CBHMX (3000). CBHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.00 vs. PTFAX (-0.65).
| CBHMX | PTFAX | CBHMX / PTFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.270 | 3.265 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 460M | 549% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.52 | 2.73 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.00 | -0.65 | -773% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.16 | 0.23 | -497% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -2.64 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -9.96 | - |