CBKM
Price
$18.56
Change
-$0.43 (-2.26%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
55.66M
CEFC
Price
$10.20
Change
-$0.10 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.88M
Ad is loading...

CBKM vs CEFC

Header iconCBKM vs CEFC Comparison
Open Charts CBKM vs CEFCBanner chart's image
Consumers Ban
Price$18.56
Change-$0.43 (-2.26%)
Volume$117
Capitalization55.66M
Commercial National Financial Corp (MI)
Price$10.20
Change-$0.10 (-0.97%)
Volume$300
Capitalization25.88M
CBKM vs CEFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBKM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBKM vs. CEFC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBKM is a Hold and CEFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CBKM: $18.56 vs. CEFC: $10.20)
Brand notoriety: CBKM and CEFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBKM: 6% vs. CEFC: 21%
Market capitalization -- CBKM: $55.66M vs. CEFC: $25.88M
CBKM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $55.66M. CEFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBKM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCEFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBKM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CEFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBKM and CEFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBKM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CEFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBKM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CEFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBKM is a better buy in the short-term than CEFC.

Price Growth

CBKM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.01% price change this week, while CEFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBKM is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBKM($55.7M) has a higher market cap than CEFC($25.9M). CEFC YTD gains are higher at: 3.553 vs. CBKM (-4.772). CBKM has more cash in the bank: 8.24M vs. CEFC (6.29M). CBKM has less debt than CEFC: CBKM (8.19M) vs CEFC (39.8M). CBKM has higher revenues than CEFC: CBKM (37M) vs CEFC (11.5M).
CBKMCEFCCBKM / CEFC
Capitalization55.7M25.9M215%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.7723.553-134%
P/E Ratio5.14N/A-
Revenue37M11.5M322%
Total Cash8.24M6.29M131%
Total Debt8.19M39.8M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBKM vs CEFC: Fundamental Ratings
CBKM
CEFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6060
SMR RATING
1..100
4741
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2538
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBKM's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CEFC (28). This means that CBKM’s stock grew similarly to CEFC’s over the last 12 months.

CBKM's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CEFC (60). This means that CBKM’s stock grew similarly to CEFC’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CBKM (47). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to CBKM’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CBKM (50). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to CBKM’s over the last 12 months.

CBKM's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as CEFC (38). This means that CBKM’s stock grew similarly to CEFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBKMCEFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CBKM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVGE74.060.56
+0.76%
Avantis All Equity Markets ETF
IMCG78.300.54
+0.69%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
XSVN46.270.01
+0.02%
BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF
EVNT10.81N/A
N/A
AltShares Event-Driven ETF
REIT27.31-0.04
-0.15%
ALPS Active REIT ETF

CBKM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBKM and BKEAF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBKM and BKEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBKM
1D Price
Change %
CBKM100%
N/A
BKEAF - CBKM
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNNF - CBKM
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCYY - CBKM
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
CEFC - CBKM
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
CBCYB - CBKM
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
More

CEFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEFC and EQGPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEFC and EQGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEFC
1D Price
Change %
CEFC100%
-0.97%
EQGPF - CEFC
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.78%
MCBK - CEFC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPERF - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.27%
NDBKY - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
CNBN - CEFC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More