CBKM
Price
$20.83
Change
+$0.13 (+0.63%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
65.51M
SNNF
Price
$12.00
Change
+$0.56 (+4.90%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
22.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBKM vs SNNF

Header iconCBKM vs SNNF Comparison
Open Charts CBKM vs SNNFBanner chart's image
Consumers Ban
Price$20.83
Change+$0.13 (+0.63%)
Volume$10.87K
Capitalization65.51M
Seneca Finl
Price$12.00
Change+$0.56 (+4.90%)
Volume$301
Capitalization22.06M
CBKM vs SNNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBKM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBKM vs. SNNF commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBKM is a Hold and SNNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CBKM: $20.83 vs. SNNF: $12.00)
Brand notoriety: CBKM and SNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBKM: 544% vs. SNNF: 12%
Market capitalization -- CBKM: $65.51M vs. SNNF: $22.06M
CBKM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $65.51M. SNNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBKM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBKM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBKM is a better buy in the long-term than SNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBKM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBKM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SNNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBKM is a better buy in the short-term than SNNF.

Price Growth

CBKM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.11% price change this week, while SNNF (@Regional Banks) price change was +16.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBKM($65.5M) has a higher market cap than SNNF($22.1M). SNNF has higher P/E ratio than CBKM: SNNF (23.40) vs CBKM (7.52). SNNF YTD gains are higher at: 65.289 vs. CBKM (10.063).
CBKMSNNFCBKM / SNNF
Capitalization65.5M22.1M296%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.06365.28915%
P/E Ratio7.5223.4032%
Revenue36.7MN/A-
Total Cash8.24MN/A-
Total Debt4.07MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBKM vs SNNF: Fundamental Ratings
CBKM
SNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4053
SMR RATING
1..100
517
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2915
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBKM's Valuation (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNNF (86). This means that CBKM’s stock grew significantly faster than SNNF’s over the last 12 months.

CBKM's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SNNF (53). This means that CBKM’s stock grew similarly to SNNF’s over the last 12 months.

SNNF's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBKM (51). This means that SNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBKM’s over the last 12 months.

SNNF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CBKM (51). This means that SNNF’s stock grew similarly to CBKM’s over the last 12 months.

SNNF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CBKM (29). This means that SNNF’s stock grew similarly to CBKM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBKMSNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBKM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSASF0.26N/A
+1.81%
RESAAS Services, Inc.
DLMI5.460.02
+0.36%
Diamond Lake Minerals, Inc.
CTSUF11.79N/A
N/A
Cactus Acquisition Corp. 1 Limited
APMSF30.50N/A
N/A
Aperam S.A.
SWOBY15.75N/A
N/A
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB

CBKM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBKM and BKEAF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBKM and BKEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBKM
1D Price
Change %
CBKM100%
N/A
BKEAF - CBKM
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNNF - CBKM
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCYY - CBKM
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
CEFC - CBKM
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCNB - CBKM
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More

SNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNNF and CBKM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNNF and CBKM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNNF
1D Price
Change %
SNNF100%
N/A
CBKM - SNNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVSB - SNNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
SMAL - SNNF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
SGBLY - SNNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
SQCF - SNNF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More