CBL
Price
$30.19
Change
+$0.84 (+2.86%)
Updated
Dec 26, 03:52 PM (EDT)
42 days until earnings call
FCXXF
Price
$12.30
Change
-$0.20 (-1.60%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CBL vs FCXXF

Header iconCBL vs FCXXF Comparison
Open Charts CBL vs FCXXFBanner chart's image
CBL & Associates Properties
Price$30.19
Change+$0.84 (+2.86%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
First Cap Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$12.30
Change-$0.20 (-1.60%)
Volume$167.34K
CapitalizationN/A
CBL vs FCXXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBL vs. FCXXF commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBL is a Buy and FCXXF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (CBL: $29.35 vs. FCXXF: $12.30)
Brand notoriety: CBL and FCXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBL: 49% vs. FCXXF: 669%
Market capitalization -- CBL: $739.38M vs. FCXXF: $2.36B
CBL [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $739.38M. FCXXF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBL is a better buy in the long-term than FCXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCXXF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCXXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCXXF is a better buy in the short-term than CBL.

Price Growth

CBL (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while FCXXF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBL is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.90% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCXXF($2.36B) has a higher market cap than CBL($739M). CBL has higher P/E ratio than FCXXF: CBL (133.29) vs FCXXF (15.95). CBL YTD gains are higher at: 28.259 vs. FCXXF (6.563). CBL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 389M vs. FCXXF (830K). CBL has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. FCXXF (82.9M). CBL has less debt than FCXXF: CBL (1.97B) vs FCXXF (4.24B). FCXXF has higher revenues than CBL: FCXXF (697M) vs CBL (535M).
CBLFCXXFCBL / FCXXF
Capitalization739M2.36B31%
EBITDA389M830K46,867%
Gain YTD28.2596.563431%
P/E Ratio133.2915.95836%
Revenue535M697M77%
Total Cash296M82.9M357%
Total Debt1.97B4.24B46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBL vs FCXXF: Fundamental Ratings
CBL
FCXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
7073
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9955
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBL's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as FCXXF (39). This means that CBL’s stock grew similarly to FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCXXF (100). This means that CBL’s stock grew significantly faster than FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CBL's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as FCXXF (73). This means that CBL’s stock grew similarly to FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CBL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FCXXF (55). This means that CBL’s stock grew similarly to FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FCXXF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBL (99). This means that FCXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBLFCXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBVTX80.230.65
+0.82%
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R3
BBISX30.620.24
+0.79%
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq Intl
DCUCX14.050.11
+0.79%
DWS CROCI US C
AICGX37.190.27
+0.73%
American Century Discplnd Cor Val R5
DEVDX12.59N/A
N/A
Driehaus Event Driven

CBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBL has been loosely correlated with OLP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBL jumps, then OLP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBL
1D Price
Change %
CBL100%
N/A
OLP - CBL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
AAT - CBL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
UHT - CBL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
KIM - CBL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
CUZ - CBL
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More

FCXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCXXF has been loosely correlated with CBAOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCXXF jumps, then CBAOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCXXF
1D Price
Change %
FCXXF100%
N/A
CBAOF - FCXXF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRRTF - FCXXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
CBL - FCXXF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBASF - FCXXF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
BNL - FCXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More