CBL
Price
$26.20
Change
+$0.32 (+1.24%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
739.38M
34 days until earnings call
FCXXF
Price
$13.29
Change
+$0.18 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBL vs FCXXF

Header iconCBL vs FCXXF Comparison
Open Charts CBL vs FCXXFBanner chart's image
CBL & Associates Properties
Price$26.20
Change+$0.32 (+1.24%)
Volume$98.25K
Capitalization739.38M
First Cap Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$13.29
Change+$0.18 (+1.37%)
Volume$11.23K
Capitalization2.36B
CBL vs FCXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBL vs. FCXXF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBL is a StrongBuy and FCXXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CBL: $26.20 vs. FCXXF: $13.29)
Brand notoriety: CBL and FCXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBL: 74% vs. FCXXF: 33%
Market capitalization -- CBL: $739.38M vs. FCXXF: $2.36B
CBL [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $739.38M. FCXXF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCXXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBL is a better buy in the long-term than FCXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCXXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FCXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCXXF is a better buy in the short-term than CBL.

Price Growth

CBL (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.95% price change this week, while FCXXF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +3.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.39% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCXXF($2.36B) has a higher market cap than CBL($739M). CBL has higher P/E ratio than FCXXF: CBL (133.29) vs FCXXF (15.95). FCXXF YTD gains are higher at: 12.247 vs. CBL (-5.519). CBL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 389M vs. FCXXF (830K). CBL has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. FCXXF (82.9M). CBL has less debt than FCXXF: CBL (1.97B) vs FCXXF (4.24B). FCXXF has higher revenues than CBL: FCXXF (697M) vs CBL (535M).
CBLFCXXFCBL / FCXXF
Capitalization739M2.36B31%
EBITDA389M830K46,867%
Gain YTD-5.51912.247-45%
P/E Ratio133.2915.95836%
Revenue535M697M77%
Total Cash296M82.9M357%
Total Debt1.97B4.24B46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBL vs FCXXF: Fundamental Ratings
CBL
FCXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1933
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
970
SMR RATING
1..100
4382
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBL's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as FCXXF (46). This means that CBL’s stock grew similarly to FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCXXF (70). This means that CBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CBL's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCXXF (82). This means that CBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FCXXF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CBL (53). This means that FCXXF’s stock grew similarly to CBL’s over the last 12 months.

FCXXF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBL (100). This means that FCXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than CBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBLFCXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLPMX4.960.03
+0.59%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus C
JCAPX61.69N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Forty I
FSRNX16.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Index
PFGEX27.85N/A
N/A
Parnassus Growth Equity Investor
FARCX14.80N/A
N/A
Nuveen Real Estate Securities I

CBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBL has been loosely correlated with SPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBL jumps, then SPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBL
1D Price
Change %
CBL100%
+1.24%
SPG - CBL
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
OUT - CBL
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
MAC - CBL
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
DEI - CBL
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
FR - CBL
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

FCXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCXXF has been loosely correlated with CBAOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCXXF jumps, then CBAOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCXXF
1D Price
Change %
FCXXF100%
N/A
CBAOF - FCXXF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRRTF - FCXXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
CBL - FCXXF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
FBASF - FCXXF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNL - FCXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More