Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBCX
CBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBCX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$55.63
Change-$0.16 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.09B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.19
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
CBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. CBLAX (10.1B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CBLAX (1.63) vs RLBCX (1.56). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CBLAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBCX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. CBLAX (6.10). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.26 vs. CBLAX (27.15).
| CBLAX | RLBCX | CBLAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.123 | 9.537 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 256B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.56 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.10 | 7.61 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.74 | 28.47 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.15 | 36.26 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.08 | 63.18 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement