Ad is loading...
CBLAX vs RLBCX
CBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBCX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$48.82
Change+$0.54 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.92B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$33.05
Change+$0.34 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.6B
CBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. CBLAX (8.92B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CBLAX (1.83) vs RLBCX (1.69). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CBLAX (22 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CBLAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBCX (171.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBCX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.33 vs. CBLAX (-1.43). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.89 vs. CBLAX (24.60).
| CBLAX | RLBCX | CBLAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.666 | -3.879 | 146% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 225B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.69 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.43 | 1.33 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.95 | 11.21 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 30.89 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.44 | 40.86 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...