Ad is loading...
CBLAX vs RLBEX
CBLAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBEX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$48.82
Change+$0.54 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.92B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$33.21
Change+$0.35 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.6B
CBLAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. CBLAX (8.92B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than CBLAX: RLBEX (1.97) vs CBLAX (1.83). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: CBLAX (22 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). CBLAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBEX (171.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBEX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.61 vs. CBLAX (-1.43). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 32.59 vs. CBLAX (24.60).
| CBLAX | RLBEX | CBLAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.60 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.60 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.666 | -3.819 | 148% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 225B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.97 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.43 | 1.61 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.95 | 12.00 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 32.59 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.44 | 45.19 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...