Ad is loading...
CBLCX vs CLBFX
CBLCX vs CLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs CLBFX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$50.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.27B
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$34.26
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
CBLCX vs CLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. CLBFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a Buy and CLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. CBLCX (9.27B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: CLBFX (2.15) vs CBLCX (1.10). CBLCX was incepted earlier than CLBFX: CBLCX (22 years) vs CLBFX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. CLBFX (44.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: CLBFX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. CBLCX (0.21). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.69 vs. CBLCX (23.33).
| CBLCX | CLBFX | CBLCX / CLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.67 | 251% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.67 | 251% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.798 | 0.495 | -363% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.27B | 234B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.15 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.21 | 4.89 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.87 | 23.73 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.33 | 39.69 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.38 | 65.92 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...