Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLCX vs RLBAX
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$55.36
Change-$0.29 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.07B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.20
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. CBLCX (10.1B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBAX (1.15) vs CBLCX (0.95). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. CBLCX (4.56). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.63 vs. CBLCX (19.61).
| CBLCX | RLBAX | CBLCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.768 | 9.656 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 255B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.15 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.56 | 6.89 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.56 | 33.51 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.61 | 32.63 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.50 | 68.89 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers