Ad is loading...
CBLCX vs RLBAX
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$50.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.27B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.02
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. CBLCX (9.27B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBAX (1.28) vs CBLCX (1.10). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.92 vs. CBLCX (0.21). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.45 vs. CBLCX (23.33).
| CBLCX | RLBAX | CBLCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.798 | 0.154 | -1,164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.27B | 234B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.28 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.21 | 3.92 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.87 | 19.69 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.33 | 32.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.38 | 44.47 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...