Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLCX vs RLBAX
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$53.49
Change+$0.18 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.84B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.17
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.05B
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 250B vs. CBLCX (9.84B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBAX (1.23) vs CBLCX (1.06). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. CBLCX (3.01). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.62 vs. CBLCX (28.43).
| CBLCX | RLBAX | CBLCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.094 | 6.620 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.84B | 250B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.23 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 6.77 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.67 | 31.51 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.43 | 38.62 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.92 | 57.01 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers