Ad is loading...
CBLCX vs RLBAX
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$48.07
Change+$0.09 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.93B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$32.64
Change-$0.09 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.48B
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. CBLCX (8.93B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBAX (1.27) vs CBLCX (1.09). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.33). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (171.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.76 vs. CBLCX (-1.56). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. CBLCX (20.03).
| CBLCX | RLBAX | CBLCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.33 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.33 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.935 | -3.908 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.93B | 225B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.27 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.56 | 1.76 | -88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.19 | 8.00 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.03 | 27.60 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.22 | 38.50 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...