Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLCX vs RLBCX
CBLCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBCX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$56.46
Change+$0.15 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.26B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.04B
CBLCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. CBLCX (10.3B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBCX (1.53) vs CBLCX (0.95). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBCX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.79 vs. CBLCX (5.35). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.40 vs. CBLCX (28.62).
| CBLCX | RLBCX | CBLCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.893 | 13.420 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 264B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.53 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.35 | 8.79 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.65 | 48.19 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.62 | 44.40 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.95 | 78.18 | 87% |