Ad is loading...
CBLCX vs RLBEX
CBLCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBEX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$48.07
Change+$0.09 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.93B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$32.90
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.48B
CBLCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. CBLCX (8.93B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBEX (1.97) vs CBLCX (1.09). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBEX (171.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBEX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. CBLCX (-1.56). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. CBLCX (20.03).
| CBLCX | RLBEX | CBLCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.60 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.60 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.935 | -3.702 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.93B | 225B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.97 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.56 | 2.55 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.19 | 9.93 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.03 | 31.66 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.22 | 46.29 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...