Ad is loading...
CBLCX vs RLBEX
CBLCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBEX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$50.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.27B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$34.31
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
CBLCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. CBLCX (9.27B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBEX (1.98) vs CBLCX (1.10). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBEX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. CBLCX (-0.09). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.69 vs. CBLCX (23.06).
| CBLCX | RLBEX | CBLCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.014 | 0.425 | -474% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.27B | 234B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.98 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | 4.73 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.15 | 21.84 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.06 | 36.69 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.32 | 52.56 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...