Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMEBX
CBLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMEBX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.8M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.99
Change+$0.49 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.9B
CBLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBLSX (156M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMEBX (1.05) vs CBLSX (0.85). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.53). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMEBX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. CBLSX (-18.40). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. CBLSX (-17.41).
| CBLSX | RMEBX | CBLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.07 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.583 | 15.619 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.05 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.40 | 5.98 | -308% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.32 | 28.37 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.41 | 52.67 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.71 | 88.07 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers