Ad is loading...
CBLSX vs RMEBX
CBLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMEBX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.34
Change+$0.07 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.06M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.27
Change+$0.18 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.3B
CBLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. CBLSX (152M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMEBX (1.18) vs CBLSX (0.92). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.89). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMEBX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. CBLSX (-17.48). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 74.87 vs. CBLSX (13.79).
| CBLSX | RMEBX | CBLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.07 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.885 | 2.774 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.18 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.48 | 6.41 | -273% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.82 | 11.06 | -288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.79 | 74.87 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.61 | 64.23 | -21% |