Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMEBX
CBLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMEBX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.65
Change+$0.09 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.49M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
CBLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. CBLSX (151M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMEBX (1.16) vs CBLSX (0.90). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.89). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMEBX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. CBLSX (-16.15). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. CBLSX (-13.92).
| CBLSX | RMEBX | CBLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.07 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.762 | 5.842 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.15 | 8.87 | -182% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.93 | 17.32 | -155% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.92 | 50.55 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.30 | 68.95 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement