Ad is loading...
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.44
Change-$0.12 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.45M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.23
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. CBLSX (164M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.69) vs CBLSX (1.44). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.03 vs. CBLSX (-12.58). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. CBLSX (-24.51).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.571 | 4.836 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.69 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.58 | 11.03 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.74 | 19.69 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.51 | 41.75 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.65 | 64.83 | -20% |