Ad is loading...
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$14.21
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. CBLSX (184M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.69) vs CBLSX (1.44). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (20 years) vs RMFCX (22 years). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.72 vs. CBLSX (19.89). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.20 vs. CBLSX (-2.33).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.463 | 18.300 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.69 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.89 | 25.72 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.21 | 17.50 | -98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.33 | 48.20 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.07 | 68.88 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...