Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.65
Change+$0.09 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.49M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. CBLSX (151M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.31) vs CBLSX (0.90). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and CBLSX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. CBLSX (-16.15). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. CBLSX (-13.92).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.762 | 5.919 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.15 | 9.01 | -179% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.93 | 17.82 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.92 | 51.66 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.30 | 70.47 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement