Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$14.27
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.34
Change+$0.37 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. CBLSX (183M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.69) vs CBLSX (1.44). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (20 years) vs RMFCX (22 years). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.55 vs. CBLSX (16.20). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.17 vs. CBLSX (-2.10).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.215 | 18.660 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.69 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.20 | 22.55 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.68 | 17.46 | -90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.10 | 48.17 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.11 | 67.23 | 33% |