Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.8M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.65
Change+$0.49 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.9B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBLSX (156M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.21) vs CBLSX (0.85). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.53). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. CBLSX (-18.40). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.79 vs. CBLSX (-17.41).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.91 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.583 | 15.796 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.21 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.40 | 6.13 | -300% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.32 | 28.94 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.41 | 53.79 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.71 | 89.93 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers