Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.39
Change+$0.04 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.24M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.35
Change+$0.25 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CBLSX (160M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.26) vs CBLSX (0.88). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.59). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. CBLSX (-16.37). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.16 vs. CBLSX (-8.27).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.91 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.599 | 11.237 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.26 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.37 | 6.61 | -248% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.58 | 28.25 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.27 | 54.16 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.66 | 89.05 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement