Ad is loading...
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.21
Change+$0.10 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.97
Change+$0.24 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. CBLSX (161M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.69) vs CBLSX (1.44). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (20 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. CBLSX (-13.96). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. CBLSX (-27.28).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.703 | 9.921 | -148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.69 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.96 | 11.11 | -126% |
| Returns for 3 years | -30.59 | 12.38 | -247% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.28 | 37.80 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.77 | 59.36 | -25% |