Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.02
Change-$0.05 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.51M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.38
Change-$0.21 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.87B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CBLSX (157M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.27) vs CBLSX (0.88). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.59). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. CBLSX (-14.84). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.49 vs. CBLSX (-0.18).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.91 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.325 | 9.449 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.27 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.84 | 9.78 | -152% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.54 | 31.02 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.18 | 61.49 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.56 | 76.01 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers