Ad is loading...
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.34
Change+$0.07 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.06M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.95
Change+$0.18 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.3B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. CBLSX (152M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.34) vs CBLSX (0.92). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and CBLSX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. CBLSX (-17.48). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.10 vs. CBLSX (13.79).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.885 | 2.814 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.34 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.48 | 6.53 | -268% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.82 | 11.52 | -276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.79 | 76.10 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.61 | 65.70 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...