Ad is loading...
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.00
Change+$0.07 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.19M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.74
Change+$0.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. CBLSX (144M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.34) vs CBLSX (0.92). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and CBLSX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. CBLSX (-19.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.30 vs. CBLSX (-3.68).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.480 | -1.247 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 97.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.34 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.88 | 3.87 | -514% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.43 | 9.64 | -337% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.68 | 54.30 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.50 | 55.97 | -33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...