Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.48
Change-$0.04 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.65M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. CBLSX (159M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.20) vs CBLSX (0.85). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.59). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. CBLSX (-15.06). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. CBLSX (-8.80).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.91 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.286 | 14.779 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.20 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.06 | 8.11 | -186% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.83 | 43.61 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.80 | 59.28 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.10 | 93.90 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement