Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.49
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.7M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CBLSX (160M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.24) vs CBLSX (0.85). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.59). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. CBLSX (-15.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.18 vs. CBLSX (-5.91).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.91 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.790 | 12.931 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.24 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.80 | 7.10 | -223% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.23 | 34.09 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.91 | 60.18 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.48 | 96.26 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement