Ad is loading...
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.46
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.23M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.52B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. CBLSX (165M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.69) vs CBLSX (1.44). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. CBLSX (-10.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.36 vs. CBLSX (-24.32).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.770 | 3.187 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.69 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.11 | 12.29 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.70 | 16.30 | -182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.32 | 40.36 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.07 | 65.40 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...