Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFEX
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFEX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.65
Change+$0.09 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.49M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. CBLSX (151M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFEX (1.58) vs CBLSX (0.90). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CBLSX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFEX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. CBLSX (-16.15). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.01 vs. CBLSX (-13.92).
| CBLSX | RMFEX | CBLSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.62 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.62 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.762 | 6.053 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.58 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.15 | 9.37 | -172% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.93 | 18.90 | -142% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.92 | 54.01 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.30 | 77.06 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers