Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFEX
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFEX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.8M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$63.06
Change+$0.49 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.9B
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBLSX (156M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFEX (1.46) vs CBLSX (0.85). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.53). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFEX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. CBLSX (-18.40). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.18 vs. CBLSX (-17.41).
| CBLSX | RMFEX | CBLSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.62 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.62 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.583 | 16.095 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.40 | 6.45 | -285% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.32 | 30.12 | -64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.41 | 56.18 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.71 | 97.51 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers