Ad is loading...
CBLSX vs RMFEX
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFEX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.00
Change+$0.07 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.19M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$54.07
Change+$0.73 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. CBLSX (144M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFEX (1.61) vs CBLSX (0.92). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CBLSX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFEX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. CBLSX (-19.88). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.67 vs. CBLSX (-3.68).
| CBLSX | RMFEX | CBLSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.62 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.62 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.480 | -1.167 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 97.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.61 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.88 | 4.18 | -475% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.43 | 10.64 | -305% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.68 | 56.67 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.50 | 61.98 | -30% |