Ad is loading...
CBLUF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 21 closing price
NITO
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
Ad is loading...

CBLUF vs NITO

Header iconCBLUF vs NITO Comparison
Open Charts CBLUF vs NITOBanner chart's image
China Bluechemical
Price$0.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
N2OFF
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$303.67K
CapitalizationN/A
CBLUF vs NITO Comparison Chart
Loading...
NITO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBLUF vs. NITO commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLUF is a Hold and NITO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CBLUF: $0.31 vs. NITO: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: CBLUF and NITO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBLUF: 9% vs. NITO: 9%
Market capitalization -- CBLUF: $1.15B vs. NITO: $3.87M
CBLUF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $1.15B. NITO’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $3.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBLUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNITO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBLUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NITO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBLUF is a better buy in the long-term than NITO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NITO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NITO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CBLUF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NITO (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +6.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

NITO is expected to report earnings on Nov 29, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (-0.55% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBLUF($1.15B) has a higher market cap than NITO($3.87M). CBLUF has higher P/E ratio than NITO: CBLUF (4.46) vs NITO (0.07). CBLUF YTD gains are higher at: 49.238 vs. NITO (-89.350).
CBLUFNITOCBLUF / NITO
Capitalization1.15B3.87M29,778%
EBITDA3.25BN/A-
Gain YTD49.238-89.350-55%
P/E Ratio4.460.076,653%
Revenue13.4BN/A-
Total Cash11.2BN/A-
Total Debt1.05BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBLUF vs NITO: Fundamental Ratings
CBLUF
NITO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
367
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
7098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4994
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1871
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBLUF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (49). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as NITO (100). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as NITO (98). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (94). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (71). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NITO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NITO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRSCX26.990.37
+1.39%
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth A
JHLVX62.120.15
+0.24%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core C
IVVYX20.92N/A
N/A
Delaware Ivy International Core Eq Y
WCERX11.08N/A
N/A
Virtus Westchester Event-Driven Fd A
BINAX9.17N/A
N/A
BlackRock Infrastructure Sust Opps Inv A

CBLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBLUF and CGA have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBLUF and CGA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBLUF
1D Price
Change %
CBLUF100%
N/A
CGA - CBLUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.29%
SBMSF - CBLUF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
NITO - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
YARIY - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
LVRO - CBLUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.95%
More

NITO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NITO and MULG have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NITO and MULG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NITO
1D Price
Change %
NITO100%
+1.48%
MULG - NITO
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHIL - NITO
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
NTR - NITO
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
CBLUF - NITO
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOS - NITO
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
More