CBLUF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.38B
NITO
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
7.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBLUF vs NITO

Header iconCBLUF vs NITO Comparison
Open Charts CBLUF vs NITOBanner chart's image
China Bluechemical
Price$0.30
Change-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Volume$40K
Capitalization1.38B
N2OFF
Price$0.23
Change+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Volume$498.74K
Capitalization7.54M
CBLUF vs NITO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NITO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBLUF vs. NITO commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLUF is a Hold and NITO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CBLUF: $0.30 vs. NITO: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: CBLUF and NITO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBLUF: 629% vs. NITO: 33%
Market capitalization -- CBLUF: $1.38B vs. NITO: $7.54M
CBLUF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $1.38B. NITO’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $7.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $50.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBLUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNITO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBLUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NITO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBLUF is a better buy in the long-term than NITO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBLUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NITO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBLUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NITO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NITO is a better buy in the short-term than CBLUF.

Price Growth

CBLUF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NITO (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +5.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (-1.88% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBLUF($1.38B) has a higher market cap than NITO($7.54M). CBLUF YTD gains are higher at: 10.701 vs. NITO (-8.871).
CBLUFNITOCBLUF / NITO
Capitalization1.38B7.54M18,345%
EBITDAN/A-7.63M-
Gain YTD10.701-8.871-121%
P/E Ratio9.76N/A-
RevenueN/A215K-
Total CashN/A3.41M-
Total DebtN/A712K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBLUF vs NITO: Fundamental Ratings
CBLUF
NITO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9162
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4591
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBLUF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (66). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (100). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NITO (100). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (91). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NITO (100). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBLUFNITO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NITO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCADX56.00N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Discv C
FRBRX143.73N/A
N/A
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery R6
WRAAX13.82N/A
N/A
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities A
MMZMX26.17N/A
N/A
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Y
GTLSX14.29-0.05
-0.35%
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf Instl Shrs

CBLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBLUF and ENFY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBLUF and ENFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBLUF
1D Price
Change %
CBLUF100%
N/A
ENFY - CBLUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
SBMSF - CBLUF
10%
Poorly correlated
+31.38%
NITO - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.35%
YARIY - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
LVRO - CBLUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-11.49%
More

NITO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NITO and ICL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NITO and ICL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NITO
1D Price
Change %
NITO100%
+6.35%
ICL - NITO
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
MULG - NITO
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTR - NITO
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
CBLUF - NITO
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOS - NITO
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More