CBLUF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.04 (+14.81%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.15B
VNPKF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
153.56M
Ad is loading...

CBLUF vs VNPKF

Header iconCBLUF vs VNPKF Comparison
Open Charts CBLUF vs VNPKFBanner chart's image
China Bluechemical
Price$0.31
Change+$0.04 (+14.81%)
Volume$101
Capitalization1.15B
Verde Agritech
Price$0.37
Change-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Volume$17K
Capitalization153.56M
CBLUF vs VNPKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBLUF vs. VNPKF commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLUF is a Hold and VNPKF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CBLUF: $0.31 vs. VNPKF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: CBLUF and VNPKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBLUF: 100% vs. VNPKF: 162%
Market capitalization -- CBLUF: $1.15B vs. VNPKF: $153.56M
CBLUF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $1.15B. VNPKF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $153.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBLUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVNPKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBLUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VNPKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBLUF is a better buy in the long-term than VNPKF.

Price Growth

CBLUF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VNPKF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -7.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+1.56% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBLUF($1.15B) has a higher market cap than VNPKF($154M). VNPKF has higher P/E ratio than CBLUF: VNPKF (13.37) vs CBLUF (4.46). CBLUF YTD gains are higher at: 15.904 vs. VNPKF (-14.510). CBLUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.25B vs. VNPKF (22.8M). CBLUF has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. VNPKF (4.29M). VNPKF has less debt than CBLUF: VNPKF (45.7M) vs CBLUF (1.05B). CBLUF has higher revenues than VNPKF: CBLUF (13.4B) vs VNPKF (80.1M).
CBLUFVNPKFCBLUF / VNPKF
Capitalization1.15B154M749%
EBITDA3.25B22.8M14,254%
Gain YTD15.904-14.510-110%
P/E Ratio4.4613.3733%
Revenue13.4B80.1M16,729%
Total Cash11.2B4.29M261,133%
Total Debt1.05B45.7M2,289%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBLUF: Fundamental Ratings
CBLUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TBWIX18.870.29
+1.56%
Thornburg Better World International I
OIGNX29.49N/A
N/A
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr R
GLCCX17.27N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts C
KGDZX26.82N/A
N/A
DWS Global Small Cap R6
PAHTX5.96N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison NextGeneration Glb Opps C

CBLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBLUF and ENFY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBLUF and ENFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBLUF
1D Price
Change %
CBLUF100%
N/A
ENFY - CBLUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
SBMSF - CBLUF
10%
Poorly correlated
+55.64%
NITO - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
YARIY - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.36%
LVRO - CBLUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More

VNPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VNPKF and YARIY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNPKF and YARIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VNPKF
1D Price
Change %
VNPKF100%
-1.60%
YARIY - VNPKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.36%
MULG - VNPKF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVRO - VNPKF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
CBLUF - VNPKF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWEL - VNPKF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.16%
More