CBOE
Price
$228.06
Change
-$0.17 (-0.07%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.4B
71 days until earnings call
EMN
Price
$81.36
Change
-$0.12 (-0.15%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.8B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBOE vs EMN

Header iconCBOE vs EMN Comparison
Open Charts CBOE vs EMNBanner chart's image
Cboe Global Markets
Price$228.06
Change-$0.17 (-0.07%)
Volume$20.82K
Capitalization19.4B
Eastman Chemical
Price$81.36
Change-$0.12 (-0.15%)
Volume$13.98K
Capitalization11.8B
CBOE vs EMN Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBOE vs. EMN commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBOE is a Buy and EMN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CBOE: $228.23 vs. EMN: $81.48)
Brand notoriety: CBOE and EMN are both not notable
CBOE represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while EMN is part of the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBOE: 85% vs. EMN: 80%
Market capitalization -- CBOE: $19.4B vs. EMN: $11.8B
CBOE [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $19.4B. EMN’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $11.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.04B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBOE’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBOE’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • EMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBOE is a better buy in the long-term than EMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBOE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBOE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBOE is a better buy in the short-term than EMN.

Price Growth

CBOE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +6.88% price change this week, while EMN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBOE is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

EMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.42% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.40% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBOE($19.4B) has a higher market cap than EMN($11.8B). CBOE has higher P/E ratio than EMN: CBOE (25.77) vs EMN (13.39). CBOE YTD gains are higher at: 17.156 vs. EMN (-9.950). EMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.81B vs. CBOE (1.27B). CBOE has more cash in the bank: 601M vs. EMN (548M). CBOE has less debt than EMN: CBOE (1.61B) vs EMN (4.85B). EMN has higher revenues than CBOE: EMN (9.21B) vs CBOE (3.77B).
CBOEEMNCBOE / EMN
Capitalization19.4B11.8B164%
EBITDA1.27B1.81B70%
Gain YTD17.156-9.950-172%
P/E Ratio25.7713.39192%
Revenue3.77B9.21B41%
Total Cash601M548M110%
Total Debt1.61B4.85B33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBOE vs EMN: Fundamental Ratings
CBOE
EMN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
168
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
354
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2572
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMN's Valuation (35) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CBOE (36) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew similarly to CBOE’s over the last 12 months.

CBOE's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMN (54) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMN’s over the last 12 months.

CBOE's SMR Rating (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EMN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

CBOE's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EMN (61) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

CBOE's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMN (72) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBOEEMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ODC48.03-0.34
-0.70%
Oil-Dri Corporation Of America
WTRG38.89-0.42
-1.07%
Essential Utilities
IVP1.60-0.03
-1.84%
Inspire Veterinary Partners Inc
VOC3.08-0.07
-2.22%
VOC Energy Trust
FIHL17.05-0.39
-2.24%
Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited

EMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMN has been closely correlated with LYB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMN jumps, then LYB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMN
1D Price
Change %
EMN100%
-1.06%
LYB - EMN
77%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
DOW - EMN
75%
Closely correlated
-3.49%
DD - EMN
75%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
AVNT - EMN
74%
Closely correlated
-3.51%
HUN - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
-4.01%
More