CBSH
Price
$62.75
Change
-$2.07 (-3.19%)
Updated
Mar 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.91B
48 days until earnings call
CNOBP
Price
$22.99
Change
-$0.11 (-0.48%)
Updated
Mar 4 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

CBSH vs CNOBP

Header iconCBSH vs CNOBP Comparison
Open Charts CBSH vs CNOBPBanner chart's image
Commerce Bancshares
Price$62.75
Change-$2.07 (-3.19%)
Volume$649.89K
Capitalization6.91B
ConnectOne Ban
Price$22.99
Change-$0.11 (-0.48%)
Volume$2.67K
CapitalizationN/A
CBSH vs CNOBP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBSH vs. CNOBP commentary
Mar 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBSH is a StrongBuy and CNOBP is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CBSH: $62.75 vs. CNOBP: $22.99)
Brand notoriety: CBSH and CNOBP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBSH: 125% vs. CNOBP: 49%
Market capitalization -- CBSH: $6.91B vs. CNOBP: $0
CBSH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.91B. CNOBP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNOBP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CNOBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBSH is a better buy in the long-term than CNOBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CBSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CBSH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.32% price change this week, while CNOBP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBSH is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNOBP YTD gains are higher at: 1.522 vs. CBSH (0.706). CBSH has more cash in the bank: 443M vs. CNOBP (61.4M). CBSH has less debt than CNOBP: CBSH (1.4M) vs CNOBP (1.03B). CBSH has higher revenues than CNOBP: CBSH (1.59B) vs CNOBP (269M).
CBSHCNOBPCBSH / CNOBP
Capitalization6.91BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.7061.52246%
P/E Ratio14.40N/A-
Revenue1.59B269M590%
Total Cash443M61.4M721%
Total Debt1.4M1.03B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBSH: Fundamental Ratings
CBSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBSH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CBSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXMTX9.81N/A
N/A
Empower Small Cap Growth Investor
DCXCX8.73N/A
N/A
Catalyst/Millburn Dynamic Cmdty Stgy C
FEVCX19.88-0.19
-0.95%
First Eagle US C
SVFDX74.24-1.25
-1.66%
Smead Value R1
IDHCX18.50-0.34
-1.80%
Integrity Dividend Harvest C

CBSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBSH has been closely correlated with HOMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBSH jumps, then HOMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBSH
1D Price
Change %
CBSH100%
-3.19%
HOMB - CBSH
85%
Closely correlated
-3.50%
IBOC - CBSH
84%
Closely correlated
-3.75%
UBSI - CBSH
84%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
HWC - CBSH
83%
Closely correlated
-3.46%
FBK - CBSH
83%
Closely correlated
-4.22%
More

CNOBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOBP has been loosely correlated with OCFCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNOBP jumps, then OCFCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOBP
1D Price
Change %
CNOBP100%
-0.48%
OCFCP - CNOBP
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
ASB - CNOBP
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
CBSH - CNOBP
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
PRK - CNOBP
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
MSBI - CNOBP
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
More