CBSH
Price
$58.09
Change
-$0.18 (-0.31%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
8.33B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HWC
Price
$74.43
Change
-$0.12 (-0.16%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.97B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBSH vs HWC

CBSH vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBSH vs. HWC commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBSH is a StrongBuy and HWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 10, 2026
Stock price -- (CBSH: $58.09 vs. HWC: $74.43)
Brand notoriety: CBSH and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBSH: 81% vs. HWC: 113%
Market capitalization -- CBSH: $8.33B vs. HWC: $5.97B
CBSH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.33B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CBSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than CBSH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBSH is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

CBSH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.70% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBSH is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBSH($8.33B) has a higher market cap than HWC($5.97B). HWC (14.60) and CBSH (14.24) have similar P/E ratio . HWC YTD gains are higher at: 19.418 vs. CBSH (13.050). CBSH has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. HWC (572M). CBSH has less debt than HWC: CBSH (26.3M) vs HWC (1.89B). CBSH has higher revenues than HWC: CBSH (1.9B) vs HWC (1.46B).
CBSHHWCCBSH / HWC
Capitalization8.33B5.97B140%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.05019.41867%
P/E Ratio14.2414.6098%
Revenue1.9B1.46B130%
Total Cash646M572M113%
Total Debt26.3M1.89B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBSH vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
CBSH
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5764
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7728
SMR RATING
1..100
1111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4621
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBSH (71). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CBSH’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBSH (77). This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBSH’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBSH (11). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CBSH’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBSH (49). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CBSH’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBSH (46). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CBSH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBSHHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CBSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCT9.67N/A
N/A
First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II
EDGE51.62-0.25
-0.49%
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
SCHX30.03-0.16
-0.53%
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF™
GRW30.67-0.22
-0.72%
TCW Durable Growth ETF
VFVA159.05-1.37
-0.85%
Vanguard US Value Factor ETF

CBSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBSH has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBSH jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBSH
1D Price
Change %
CBSH100%
-0.16%
HWC - CBSH
83%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
UCB - CBSH
81%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
UBSI - CBSH
81%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
SSB - CBSH
81%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
HOMB - CBSH
80%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
More