It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -5.37% price change this week, while KRO (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -6.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.20%.
CBT is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
KRO is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
CBT | KRO | CBT / KRO | |
Capitalization | 5.11B | 1.38B | 371% |
EBITDA | 701M | -2.7M | -25,963% |
Gain YTD | 32.052 | 18.916 | 169% |
P/E Ratio | 12.08 | 34.22 | 35% |
Revenue | 3.92B | 1.67B | 236% |
Total Cash | 244M | 195M | 125% |
Total Debt | 1.31B | 463M | 283% |
CBT | KRO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KRO's Valuation (8) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBT (68) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that KRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBT’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRO (74) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew significantly faster than KRO’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's SMR Rating (25) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRO (86) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRO’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as KRO (56) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew similarly to KRO’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRO (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew significantly faster than KRO’s over the last 12 months.
CBT | KRO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago71% | 12 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 4 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRO has been loosely correlated with TROX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRO jumps, then TROX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KRO | 100% | +0.09% | ||
TROX - KRO | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
CE - KRO | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
CBT - KRO | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
FUL - KRO | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
AVNT - KRO | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
More |