CBT
Price
$94.92
Change
-$5.17 (-5.17%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
53 days until earnings call
TYNPF
Price
$29.63
Change
+$2.38 (+8.73%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CBT vs TYNPF

Header iconCBT vs TYNPF Comparison
Open Charts CBT vs TYNPFBanner chart's image
Cabot
Price$94.92
Change-$5.17 (-5.17%)
Volume$1.35K
CapitalizationN/A
Nippon Sanso Holdings
Price$29.63
Change+$2.38 (+8.73%)
Volume$497
CapitalizationN/A
CBT vs TYNPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TYNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBT vs. TYNPF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBT is a Buy and TYNPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CBT: $94.97 vs. TYNPF: $29.63)
Brand notoriety: CBT and TYNPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBT: 132% vs. TYNPF: 50%
Market capitalization -- CBT: $5.11B vs. TYNPF: $10.55B
CBT [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $5.11B. TYNPF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $10.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTYNPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TYNPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBT is a better buy in the long-term than TYNPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TYNPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TYNPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CBT and TYNPF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CBT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -9.56% price change this week, while TYNPF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBT is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.47% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYNPF($10.6B) has a higher market cap than CBT($5.11B). TYNPF has higher P/E ratio than CBT: TYNPF (20.28) vs CBT (12.08). CBT YTD gains are higher at: 21.948 vs. TYNPF (10.305). TYNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 227B vs. CBT (701M). TYNPF has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. CBT (244M). CBT has less debt than TYNPF: CBT (1.31B) vs TYNPF (900B). TYNPF has higher revenues than CBT: TYNPF (1.19T) vs CBT (3.92B).
CBTTYNPFCBT / TYNPF
Capitalization5.11B10.6B48%
EBITDA701M227B0%
Gain YTD21.94810.305213%
P/E Ratio12.0820.2860%
Revenue3.92B1.19T0%
Total Cash244M155B0%
Total Debt1.31B900B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBT: Fundamental Ratings
CBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBTTYNPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TYNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLXAX28.07N/A
N/A
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure A
BRKAX13.75-0.16
-1.15%
MFS Blended Research Em Mkts Eq A
CSHZX11.89-0.36
-2.94%
NYLI Cushing® MLP Premier Class I
TSCSX32.45-1.34
-3.97%
Thrivent Small Cap Stock S
VGSIX29.66-1.26
-4.08%
Vanguard Real Estate Index Investor

CBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBT has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBT jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBT
1D Price
Change %
CBT100%
-1.79%
AVNT - CBT
76%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
WLK - CBT
69%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
OEC - CBT
69%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
FUL - CBT
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
IOSP - CBT
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
More

TYNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TYNPF and CBT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYNPF and CBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYNPF
1D Price
Change %
TYNPF100%
+8.73%
CBT - TYNPF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.12%
OEC - TYNPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.53%
AVNT - TYNPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.73%
TROX - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
SKFOF - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
More