CBU
Price
$56.16
Change
+$0.13 (+0.23%)
Updated
Oct 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.97B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
FFBC
Price
$24.33
Change
+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Updated
Oct 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.33B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBU vs FFBC

Header iconCBU vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts CBU vs FFBCBanner chart's image
Community Financial System
Price$56.16
Change+$0.13 (+0.23%)
Volume$1.22K
Capitalization2.97B
First Financial Ban
Price$24.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Volume$9.01K
Capitalization2.33B
CBU vs FFBC Comparison Chart in %
CBU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBU vs. FFBC commentary
Oct 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBU is a Hold and FFBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CBU: $56.18 vs. FFBC: $24.35)
Brand notoriety: CBU and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBU: 92% vs. FFBC: 78%
Market capitalization -- CBU: $2.97B vs. FFBC: $2.33B
CBU [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.97B. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than CBU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than CBU.

Price Growth

CBU (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.93% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +4.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBU is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+4.65% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBU($2.97B) has a higher market cap than FFBC($2.33B). CBU has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: CBU (14.48) vs FFBC (9.74). CBU (-6.682) and FFBC (-7.007) have similar YTD gains . CBU has less debt than FFBC: CBU (714M) vs FFBC (1.03B). FFBC has higher revenues than CBU: FFBC (852M) vs CBU (781M).
CBUFFBCCBU / FFBC
Capitalization2.97B2.33B127%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.682-7.00795%
P/E Ratio14.489.74149%
Revenue781M852M92%
Total CashN/A210M-
Total Debt714M1.03B69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBU vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
CBU
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5370
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7623
SMR RATING
1..100
1715
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7863
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBU (76). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBU’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBU (76). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBU’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBU (17). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CBU’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBU (61). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CBU’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBU (78). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CBU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBUFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNORX68.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Nordic
HFDCX18.43N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
GQGIX17.87N/A
N/A
GQG Partners Emerging Markets EquityInst
RMBMX13.04N/A
N/A
RMB SMID Cap I
JHTCX20.39N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 C

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+2.45%
TCBK - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
UBSI - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
FNB - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
EBC - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
PFS - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
More