CBULF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
18.53M
TWRFF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
11.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBULF vs TWRFF

Header iconCBULF vs TWRFF Comparison
Open Charts CBULF vs TWRFFBanner chart's image
Gratomic
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization18.53M
Tower Resources
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$700
Capitalization11.5M
CBULF vs TWRFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBULF vs. TWRFF commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBULF is a Hold and TWRFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CBULF: $0.04 vs. TWRFF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CBULF and TWRFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBULF: 1% vs. TWRFF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CBULF: $18.53M vs. TWRFF: $11.5M
CBULF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $18.53M. TWRFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $11.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBULF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTWRFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBULF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TWRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBULF is a better buy in the long-term than TWRFF.

Price Growth

CBULF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -70.03% price change this week, while TWRFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -10.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.29% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBULF($18.5M) has a higher market cap than TWRFF($11.5M). CBULF YTD gains are higher at: -16.492 vs. TWRFF (-24.922). TWRFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -919.13K vs. CBULF (-5.67M). TWRFF has more cash in the bank: 793K vs. CBULF (115K). CBULF (0) and TWRFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CBULFTWRFFCBULF / TWRFF
Capitalization18.5M11.5M161%
EBITDA-5.67M-919.13K617%
Gain YTD-16.492-24.92266%
P/E RatioN/A277.78-
Revenue00-
Total Cash115K793K15%
Total Debt216KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBULF vs TWRFF: Fundamental Ratings
CBULF
TWRFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2734
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
9391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBULF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TWRFF (93). This means that CBULF’s stock grew significantly faster than TWRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TWRFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CBULF (100). This means that TWRFF’s stock grew similarly to CBULF’s over the last 12 months.

TWRFF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CBULF (93). This means that TWRFF’s stock grew similarly to CBULF’s over the last 12 months.

CBULF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as TWRFF (62). This means that CBULF’s stock grew similarly to TWRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TWRFF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CBULF (100). This means that TWRFF’s stock grew similarly to CBULF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIIG20.430.06
+0.29%
First Trust Intermediate DurInvGrdCrpETF
SDG74.89-0.13
-0.17%
iShares MSCI Global Sust Dev Goals ETF
RAYS8.33-0.02
-0.18%
Global X Solar ETF
FEUZ52.82-0.21
-0.40%
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® ETF
ICF60.18-0.28
-0.46%
iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF

CBULF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBULF and MRRDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBULF and MRRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBULF
1D Price
Change %
CBULF100%
-30.00%
MRRDF - CBULF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
WWR - CBULF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
TWRFF - CBULF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHXMF - CBULF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
CAMZF - CBULF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TWRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TWRFF and MANVF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TWRFF and MANVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWRFF
1D Price
Change %
TWRFF100%
N/A
MANVF - TWRFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TWOSF - TWRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBULF - TWRFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-30.00%
HPQFF - TWRFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
TTEXF - TWRFF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More