CBULF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
18.53M
TWRFF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
11.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBULF vs TWRFF

Header iconCBULF vs TWRFF Comparison
Open Charts CBULF vs TWRFFBanner chart's image
Gratomic
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$8.6K
Capitalization18.53M
Tower Resources
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$100K
Capitalization11.5M
CBULF vs TWRFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBULF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBULF vs. TWRFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBULF is a Hold and TWRFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CBULF: $0.09 vs. TWRFF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: CBULF and TWRFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBULF: 48% vs. TWRFF: 623%
Market capitalization -- CBULF: $18.53M vs. TWRFF: $11.5M
CBULF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $18.53M. TWRFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $11.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBULF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTWRFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBULF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TWRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBULF is a better buy in the long-term than TWRFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBULF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWRFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBULF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TWRFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBULF is a better buy in the short-term than TWRFF.

Price Growth

CBULF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +178.23% price change this week, while TWRFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +6.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBULF($18.5M) has a higher market cap than TWRFF($11.5M). CBULF YTD gains are higher at: 102.806 vs. TWRFF (-18.582). TWRFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -919.13K vs. CBULF (-5.67M). TWRFF has more cash in the bank: 793K vs. CBULF (115K). CBULF (0) and TWRFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CBULFTWRFFCBULF / TWRFF
Capitalization18.5M11.5M161%
EBITDA-5.67M-919.13K617%
Gain YTD102.806-18.582-553%
P/E RatioN/A277.78-
Revenue00-
Total Cash115K793K15%
Total Debt216KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBULF vs TWRFF: Fundamental Ratings
CBULF
TWRFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
9691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBULF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWRFF (93). This means that CBULF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TWRFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CBULF (100). This means that TWRFF’s stock grew similarly to CBULF’s over the last 12 months.

TWRFF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CBULF (96). This means that TWRFF’s stock grew similarly to CBULF’s over the last 12 months.

CBULF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TWRFF (61). This means that CBULF’s stock grew similarly to TWRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TWRFF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CBULF (100). This means that TWRFF’s stock grew similarly to CBULF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBULFTWRFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBULF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVIVF0.06N/A
+4.80%
REPLENISH NUTRIENTS HLDG CORP.
ASEKY13.01N/A
N/A
Aisin Corporation
CYRBY4.73N/A
N/A
Cyrela Brazil Realty S.A.
GRRLF0.12N/A
N/A
Grange Resources Ltd.
WELPM108.00N/A
N/A
Wisconsin Electric Power Co.

CBULF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBULF and MRRDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBULF and MRRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBULF
1D Price
Change %
CBULF100%
N/A
MRRDF - CBULF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
WWR - CBULF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
TWRFF - CBULF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHXMF - CBULF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
CAMZF - CBULF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More