CBUMF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.12 (+27.91%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.3B
TGLS
Price
$74.39
Change
+$2.60 (+3.62%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.45B
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CBUMF vs TGLS

Header iconCBUMF vs TGLS Comparison
Open Charts CBUMF vs TGLSBanner chart's image
China National Buildings Material
Price$0.55
Change+$0.12 (+27.91%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization5.3B
Tecnoglass
Price$74.39
Change+$2.60 (+3.62%)
Volume$254.31K
Capitalization2.45B
CBUMF vs TGLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBUMF vs. TGLS commentary
May 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBUMF is a Hold and TGLS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CBUMF: $0.55 vs. TGLS: $74.39)
Brand notoriety: CBUMF and TGLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBUMF: 100% vs. TGLS: 62%
Market capitalization -- CBUMF: $5.3B vs. TGLS: $2.45B
CBUMF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $5.3B. TGLS’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBUMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CBUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TGLS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGLS is a better buy in the long-term than CBUMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TGLS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TGLS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CBUMF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TGLS (@Construction Materials) price change was +2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.24% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBUMF($5.3B) has a higher market cap than TGLS($2.45B). TGLS has higher P/E ratio than CBUMF: TGLS (13.39) vs CBUMF (4.27). CBUMF YTD gains are higher at: 28.163 vs. TGLS (-6.016). CBUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.6B vs. TGLS (292M). CBUMF has more cash in the bank: 44.1B vs. TGLS (132M). TGLS has less debt than CBUMF: TGLS (170M) vs CBUMF (188B). CBUMF has higher revenues than TGLS: CBUMF (261B) vs TGLS (833M).
CBUMFTGLSCBUMF / TGLS
Capitalization5.3B2.45B217%
EBITDA35.6B292M12,192%
Gain YTD28.163-6.016-468%
P/E Ratio4.2713.3932%
Revenue261B833M31,333%
Total Cash44.1B132M33,409%
Total Debt188B170M110,588%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBUMF vs TGLS: Fundamental Ratings
CBUMF
TGLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1007
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
814
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBUMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as TGLS (18) in the Building Products industry. This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBUMF (100) in the null industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew significantly faster than CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's SMR Rating (100) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CBUMF (100) in the null industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as TGLS (46) in the Building Products industry. This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as TGLS (14) in the Building Products industry. This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TGLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMCLX14.530.34
+2.40%
Federated Hermes Mid-Cap Index R6
ARGFX63.951.48
+2.37%
Ariel Fund Investor
VAFAX27.080.46
+1.73%
Invesco American Franchise A
GIIRX9.640.16
+1.69%
Nationwide International Index R
CVAIX21.660.31
+1.45%
Calamos Select Fund I

CBUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBUMF and CBUMY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBUMF and CBUMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBUMF
1D Price
Change %
CBUMF100%
N/A
CBUMY - CBUMF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARCY - CBUMF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZZUY - CBUMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
SUM - CBUMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLS - CBUMF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
More

TGLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGLS has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGLS jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGLS
1D Price
Change %
TGLS100%
+3.62%
CRH - TGLS
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
BCC - TGLS
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.71%
EXP - TGLS
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
KNF - TGLS
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
SUM - TGLS
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More