CBYDF
Price
$10.13
Change
-$0.20 (-1.94%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
324.94M
DWWEF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
38.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBYDF vs DWWEF

Header iconCBYDF vs DWWEF Comparison
Open Charts CBYDF vs DWWEFBanner chart's image
Corby Spirit and Wine
Price$10.13
Change-$0.20 (-1.94%)
Volume$100
Capitalization324.94M
Diamond Estates Wines & Spirits
Price$0.14
Change-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Volume$100
Capitalization38.98M
CBYDF vs DWWEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBYDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DWWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBYDF vs. DWWEF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBYDF is a Hold and DWWEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CBYDF: $10.13 vs. DWWEF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CBYDF and DWWEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBYDF: 54% vs. DWWEF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CBYDF: $324.94M vs. DWWEF: $38.98M
CBYDF [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $324.94M. DWWEF’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $38.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBYDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDWWEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBYDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DWWEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBYDF is a better buy in the long-term than DWWEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBYDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DWWEF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBYDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • DWWEF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBYDF is a better buy in the short-term than DWWEF.

Price Growth

CBYDF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DWWEF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+1.54% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBYDF($325M) has a higher market cap than DWWEF($39M). CBYDF YTD gains are higher at: 16.303 vs. DWWEF (-9.051). CBYDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.4M vs. DWWEF (-264.02K). CBYDF has more cash in the bank: 46M vs. DWWEF (616K). CBYDF has less debt than DWWEF: CBYDF (3.65M) vs DWWEF (26.9M). CBYDF has higher revenues than DWWEF: CBYDF (160M) vs DWWEF (27M).
CBYDFDWWEFCBYDF / DWWEF
Capitalization325M39M833%
EBITDA47.4M-264.02K-17,953%
Gain YTD16.303-9.051-180%
P/E Ratio18.94N/A-
Revenue160M27M593%
Total Cash46M616K7,468%
Total Debt3.65M26.9M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBYDF vs DWWEF: Fundamental Ratings
CBYDF
DWWEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3599
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5380
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7412
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBYDF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DWWEF (94). This means that CBYDF’s stock grew significantly faster than DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

CBYDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DWWEF (100). This means that CBYDF’s stock grew similarly to DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

CBYDF's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DWWEF (93). This means that CBYDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

CBYDF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as DWWEF (80). This means that CBYDF’s stock grew similarly to DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

DWWEF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBYDF (74). This means that DWWEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBYDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBYDFDWWEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBYDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DWWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMPLF24.00N/A
N/A
Johnson Matthey plc
EMSKD0.11N/A
N/A
Germanium Mining Corp
PLRRF6.40N/A
N/A
Polar Capital Holdings PLC
MTMV1.10N/A
N/A
MOTOMOVA INC.
CNGKY8.70-0.02
-0.23%
CK Asset Hldgs Ltd

CBYDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBYDF and CABGY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBYDF and CABGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBYDF
1D Price
Change %
CBYDF100%
N/A
CABGY - CBYDF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
DVDCF - CBYDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.44%
CABJF - CBYDF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRBBF - CBYDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWGL - CBYDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More

DWWEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DWWEF and CWGL have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DWWEF and CWGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DWWEF
1D Price
Change %
DWWEF100%
N/A
CWGL - DWWEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CABJF - DWWEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBYDF - DWWEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRHKF - DWWEF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-10.66%
CRBBF - DWWEF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More