CBZ vs GECSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBZ is a Hold and GECSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGECSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CBZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GECSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CBZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CBZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +2.68% price change this week, while GECSF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -2.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+3.18% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| CBZ | GECSF | CBZ / GECSF | |
| Capitalization | 3.93B | 20.1M | 19,572% |
| EBITDA | 223M | -45.18M | -494% |
| Gain YTD | -5.340 | -12.500 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.58 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.59B | 75.9M | 2,096% |
| Total Cash | 8.09M | 7.57M | 107% |
| Total Debt | 551M | 282M | 195% |
CBZ | GECSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GECSF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBZ (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GECSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBZ’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GECSF (100) in the null industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew significantly faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's SMR Rating (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GECSF (92) in the null industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew similarly to GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GECSF (58) in the null industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew similarly to GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GECSF (97) in the null industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew significantly faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
| CBZ | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PFFA | 20.14 | 0.19 | +0.95% |
| Virtus InfraCap US Preferred Stock ETF | |||
| NXTE | 28.34 | 0.21 | +0.74% |
| AXS Green Alpha ETF | |||
| TVE | 23.27 | 0.15 | +0.65% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029 | |||
| VFL | 9.68 | 0.04 | +0.44% |
| abrdn National Municipal Income Fund | |||
| UTWO | 48.49 | N/A | N/A |
| US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | |||
CBZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBZ has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBZ jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBZ | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| EXPO - CBZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| CTAS - CBZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| VRSK - CBZ | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| QUAD - CBZ | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| GHC - CBZ | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||
GECSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GECSF and BMBLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GECSF and BMBLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GECSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GECSF | 100% | -11.30% | ||
| BMBLF - GECSF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CBZ - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
| SCGPY - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VCIG - GECSF | 12% Poorly correlated | +10.29% | ||
| AERT - GECSF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||