Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCACX vs FSMDX
CCACX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CCACX vs FSMDX
CCACX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCACX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCACX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. CCACX (212M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CCACX: FSMDX (1.14) vs CCACX (0.00). CCACX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CCACX (31 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). CCACX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCACX: FSMDX (0) vs CCACX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. CCACX (-0.69). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 79.09 vs. CCACX (5.39).
| CCACX | FSMDX | CCACX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.03 | 7,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.03 | 8,000% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.555 | 3.198 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 40.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.69 | 12.60 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.57 | 40.70 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.39 | 79.09 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.79 | 116.87 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement