Ad is loading...
CCACX vs FSMDX
CCACX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CCACX vs FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$30.10
Change-$1.10 (-3.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
CCACX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCACX vs. FSMDX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCACX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. CCACX (214M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CCACX: FSMDX (1.20) vs CCACX (0.00). CCACX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CCACX (30 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). CCACX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCACX: FSMDX (0) vs CCACX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.30 vs. CCACX (-6.53). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.82 vs. CCACX (5.30).
| CCACX | FSMDX | CCACX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.03 | 7,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.03 | 8,000% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.409 | -7.610 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214M | 37.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.53 | -0.30 | 2,153% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.87 | 10.14 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.30 | 75.82 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.78 | 87.59 | -32% |