Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAFX vs FSMDX
CCAFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CCAFX vs FSMDX
CCAFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAFX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. CCAFX (212M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CCAFX: FSMDX (1.14) vs CCAFX (0.09). CCAFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CCAFX (31 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). CCAFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CCAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAFX: FSMDX (0) vs CCAFX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. CCAFX (2.34). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.63 vs. CCAFX (16.69).
| CCAFX | FSMDX | CCAFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.03 | 4,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.03 | 5,000% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.325 | 2.547 | -13% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 40.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.14 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.34 | 11.57 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.92 | 47.41 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.69 | 70.63 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.05 | 109.11 | 0% |