CCAP
Price
$15.04
Change
+$0.30 (+2.04%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
636.72M
60 days until earnings call
NMFC
Price
$10.77
Change
+$0.09 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCAP vs NMFC

Header iconCCAP vs NMFC Comparison
Open Charts CCAP vs NMFCBanner chart's image
Crescent Capital BDC
Price$15.04
Change+$0.30 (+2.04%)
Volume$193.66K
Capitalization636.72M
New Mountain Finance
Price$10.77
Change+$0.09 (+0.84%)
Volume$329.32K
Capitalization1.34B
CCAP vs NMFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCAP vs. NMFC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAP is a Hold and NMFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCAP: $15.04 vs. NMFC: $10.77)
Brand notoriety: CCAP and NMFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCAP: 107% vs. NMFC: 61%
Market capitalization -- CCAP: $636.72M vs. NMFC: $1.34B
CCAP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $636.72M. NMFC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCAP’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNMFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CCAP’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • NMFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCAP is a better buy in the long-term than NMFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NMFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the short-term than CCAP.

Price Growth

CCAP (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.09% price change this week, while NMFC (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

NMFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.30% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMFC($1.34B) has a higher market cap than CCAP($637M). NMFC has higher P/E ratio than CCAP: NMFC (10.15) vs CCAP (7.37). NMFC YTD gains are higher at: -1.528 vs. CCAP (-19.341). CCAP has less debt than NMFC: CCAP (845M) vs NMFC (1.79B). NMFC has higher revenues than CCAP: NMFC (144M) vs CCAP (92.5M).
CCAPNMFCCCAP / NMFC
Capitalization637M1.34B48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.341-1.5281,266%
P/E Ratio7.3710.1573%
Revenue92.5M144M64%
Total Cash3.87MN/A-
Total Debt845M1.79B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMFC: Fundamental Ratings
NMFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCAPNMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPUMX12.78N/A
N/A
Principal LargeCap Growth I R3
MAPTX18.99N/A
N/A
Matthews Pacific Tiger Investor
NRILX15.42N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman International Sel R6
TEGCX15.26N/A
N/A
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
LSFLX13.64N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
+0.84%
FSK - NMFC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
ARCC - NMFC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
TSLX - NMFC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
SLRC - NMFC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
BCSF - NMFC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
More