Ad is loading...
CCATX vs FBATX
CCATX vs FBATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCATX vs. FBATX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCATX is a Hold and FBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCATX (3.79B) and FBATX (3.79B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBATX pays higher dividends than CCATX: FBATX (3.15) vs CCATX (2.09). CCATX was incepted earlier than FBATX: CCATX (11 years) vs FBATX (11 years). CCATX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FBATX (0.38). CCATX (8.00) and FBATX (8.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCATX (250) and FBATX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. CCATX (5.83). FBATX return over 5 years is better than : 22.65 vs. CCATX (17.83).
| CCATX | FBATX | CCATX / FBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.38 | 361% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.38 | 361% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.620 | 2.941 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.79B | 3.79B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 3.15 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 6.92 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.91 | 13.68 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.83 | 22.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.72 | 30.48 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...