Ad is loading...
CCAZX vs FKTFX
CCAZX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FKTFX
Columbia Strat CA Muncpl Inc Inst
Price$25.93
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.46M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
CCAZX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FKTFX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. CCAZX (309M). CCAZX (3.74) and FKTFX (3.67) have matching dividends . CCAZX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: CCAZX (20 years) vs FKTFX (48 years). FKTFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than CCAZX (0.57). CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FKTFX (14.01). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: FKTFX (1000) vs CCAZX (2000). CCAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. FKTFX (1.21). CCAZX return over 5 years is better than : 3.71 vs. FKTFX (-0.16).
| CCAZX | FKTFX | CCAZX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.61 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.61 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 48 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.666 | -2.644 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 12.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 3.67 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | 1.21 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.07 | 3.26 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.71 | -0.16 | -2,321% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.80 | 1.51 | 846% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...