Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs FKTFX
CCAZX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FKTFX
Columbia Strat CA Muncpl Inc Inst
Price$25.74
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.45M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
CCAZX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FKTFX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. CCAZX (307M). CCAZX (3.82) and FKTFX (3.72) have matching dividends . CCAZX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: CCAZX (20 years) vs FKTFX (48 years). FKTFX (0.61) and CCAZX (0.59) have similar cost to investors . CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: FKTFX (1000) vs CCAZX (2000). CCAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.58 vs. FKTFX (0.18). CCAZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.10 vs. FKTFX (-3.16).
| CCAZX | FKTFX | CCAZX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.61 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 48 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.799 | -2.483 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 12.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.82 | 3.72 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.58 | 0.18 | 327% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.71 | 4.95 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.10 | -3.16 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.66 | 2.37 | 577% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers