Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs FKTFX
CCAZX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FKTFX
Columbia Strat CA Muncpl Inc Inst
Price$25.57
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.95M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.54B
CCAZX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FKTFX commentary
Aug 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. CCAZX (302M). CCAZX (3.94) and FKTFX (3.80) have matching dividends . CCAZX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: CCAZX (20 years) vs FKTFX (49 years). FKTFX (0.60) and CCAZX (0.59) have similar cost to investors . CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: FKTFX (1000) vs CCAZX (2000). FKTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.24 vs. CCAZX (-2.57). CCAZX return over 5 years is better than : -3.32 vs. FKTFX (-5.18).
| CCAZX | FKTFX | CCAZX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.60 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 49 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.508 | -2.124 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302M | 12.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.94 | 3.80 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.57 | -2.24 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.22 | 3.82 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.32 | -5.18 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.99 | 2.61 | 460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement