Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs FRCTX
CCAZX vs FRCTX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FRCTX
Columbia Strat CA Muncpl Inc Inst
Price$25.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.21M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income C
Price$6.48
Change-$0.02 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
CCAZX vs FRCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FRCTX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FRCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCTX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. CCAZX (303M). CCAZX pays higher dividends than FRCTX: CCAZX (3.88) vs FRCTX (3.20). CCAZX was incepted earlier than FRCTX: CCAZX (20 years) vs FRCTX (30 years). FRCTX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CCAZX (0.59). CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FRCTX (7.96). FRCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: FRCTX (1000) vs CCAZX (2000). FRCTX (-2.54) and CCAZX (-2.60) have marching annual gain over last year. CCAZX return over 5 years is better than : -3.49 vs. FRCTX (-7.23).
| CCAZX | FRCTX | CCAZX / FRCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.16 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.16 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.404 | -3.016 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 12.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 3.20 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | -2.54 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.68 | 1.46 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.49 | -7.23 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.33 | 0.40 | 3,112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement