Ad is loading...
CCAZX vs FRCTX
CCAZX vs FRCTX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FRCTX
Columbia Strat CA Muncpl Inc Inst
Price$25.93
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.46M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income C
Price$6.58
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
CCAZX vs FRCTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FRCTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FRCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCTX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. CCAZX (309M). CCAZX pays higher dividends than FRCTX: CCAZX (3.74) vs FRCTX (3.11). CCAZX was incepted earlier than FRCTX: CCAZX (20 years) vs FRCTX (30 years). FRCTX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CCAZX (0.57). CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FRCTX (14.01). FRCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: FRCTX (1000) vs CCAZX (2000). CCAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. FRCTX (0.65). CCAZX return over 5 years is better than : 3.71 vs. FRCTX (-1.80).
| CCAZX | FRCTX | CCAZX / FRCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.16 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.16 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.666 | -2.779 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 12.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 3.11 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | 0.65 | 311% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.07 | 2.00 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.71 | -1.80 | -206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.80 | -0.84 | -1,519% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers