Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs FTFQX
CCAZX vs FTFQX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FTFQX
Columbia Strat CA Muncpl Inc Inst
Price$25.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.21M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
CCAZX vs FTFQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FTFQX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FTFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. CCAZX (303M). CCAZX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: CCAZX (3.88) vs FTFQX (3.60). CCAZX was incepted earlier than FTFQX: CCAZX (20 years) vs FTFQX (7 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CCAZX (0.59). CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: FTFQX (1000) vs CCAZX (2000). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.29 vs. CCAZX (-2.60). CCAZX return over 5 years is better than : -3.49 vs. FTFQX (-6.04).
| CCAZX | FTFQX | CCAZX / FTFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.76 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.76 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.404 | -2.816 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 12.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 3.60 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | -2.29 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.68 | 2.46 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.49 | -6.04 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers