Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs FTFQX
CCAZX vs FTFQX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FTFQX
Columbia Strat CA Muncpl Inc Inst
Price$25.74
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.45M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
CCAZX vs FTFQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FTFQX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FTFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. CCAZX (307M). CCAZX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: CCAZX (3.82) vs FTFQX (3.56). CCAZX was incepted earlier than FTFQX: CCAZX (20 years) vs FTFQX (7 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CCAZX (0.59). CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: FTFQX (1000) vs CCAZX (2000). CCAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.58 vs. FTFQX (0.03). CCAZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.10 vs. FTFQX (-3.65).
| CCAZX | FTFQX | CCAZX / FTFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.76 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.76 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.799 | -2.527 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 12.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.82 | 3.56 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.58 | 0.03 | 2,261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.71 | 4.58 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.10 | -3.65 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers