CCB
Price
$79.54
Change
-$4.63 (-5.50%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
35 days until earnings call
UWHR
Price
$8.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

CCB vs UWHR

Header iconCCB vs UWHR Comparison
Open Charts CCB vs UWHRBanner chart's image
Coastal Financial
Price$79.54
Change-$4.63 (-5.50%)
Volume$125.84K
CapitalizationN/A
Uwharrie Capital
Price$8.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$872
CapitalizationN/A
CCB vs UWHR Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UWHR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCB vs. UWHR commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCB is a StrongBuy and UWHR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CCB: $79.54 vs. UWHR: $8.25)
Brand notoriety: CCB and UWHR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCB: 126% vs. UWHR: 43%
Market capitalization -- CCB: $520.18M vs. UWHR: $50.23M
CCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $520.18M. UWHR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $50.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUWHR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UWHR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCB is a better buy in the long-term than UWHR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UWHR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UWHR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UWHR is a better buy in the short-term than CCB.

Price Growth

CCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while UWHR (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCB($520M) has a higher market cap than UWHR($50.2M). CCB has higher P/E ratio than UWHR: CCB (11.68) vs UWHR (5.88). CCB YTD gains are higher at: 79.104 vs. UWHR (2.000). UWHR has less debt than CCB: UWHR (30.4M) vs CCB (53.9M). CCB has higher revenues than UWHR: CCB (352M) vs UWHR (38.2M).
CCBUWHRCCB / UWHR
Capitalization520M50.2M1,036%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD79.1042.0003,955%
P/E Ratio11.685.88199%
Revenue352M38.2M921%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt53.9M30.4M177%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCB vs UWHR: Fundamental Ratings
CCB
UWHR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9018
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
637
SMR RATING
1..100
1630
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
668
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UWHR's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCB (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that UWHR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCB’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UWHR (37) in the null industry. This means that CCB’s stock grew similarly to UWHR’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UWHR (30) in the null industry. This means that CCB’s stock grew similarly to UWHR’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UWHR (51) in the null industry. This means that CCB’s stock grew similarly to UWHR’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UWHR (68) in the null industry. This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than UWHR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCBUWHR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UWHR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JBBB49.29-0.03
-0.06%
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
PFFR18.75-0.17
-0.90%
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
AVSU66.36-2.07
-3.02%
Avantis Responsible US Equity ETF
TMFX19.66-0.87
-4.24%
Motley Fool Next ETF
NEXO.X1.371641-0.100268
-6.81%
Nexo cryptocurrency

CCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCB has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCB jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCB
1D Price
Change %
CCB100%
-5.50%
FFBC - CCB
80%
Closely correlated
-5.70%
UCB - CCB
78%
Closely correlated
-5.47%
PPBI - CCB
78%
Closely correlated
-6.21%
EBC - CCB
78%
Closely correlated
-4.95%
FRME - CCB
77%
Closely correlated
-5.87%
More

UWHR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UWHR has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UWHR jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UWHR
1D Price
Change %
UWHR100%
N/A
BNCZF - UWHR
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JDVB - UWHR
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPFOF - UWHR
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
AX - UWHR
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.65%
CCB - UWHR
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.50%
More