CCBC
Price
$12.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
FBMS
Price
$33.96
Change
+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CCBC vs FBMS

Header iconCCBC vs FBMS Comparison
Open Charts CCBC vs FBMSBanner chart's image
Chino Commercial Ban
Price$12.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
First Bancshares
Price$33.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Volume$78.47K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CCBC vs FBMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FBMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CCBC vs. FBMS commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCBC is a Hold and FBMS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CCBC: $12.95 vs. FBMS: $33.96)
Brand notoriety: CCBC and FBMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCBC: 39% vs. FBMS: 40%
Market capitalization -- CCBC: $13.04M vs. FBMS: $796.94M
CCBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.04M. FBMS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $796.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBMS is a better buy in the long-term than CCBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FBMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CCBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.19% price change this week, while FBMS (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBMS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBMS($797M) has a higher market cap than CCBC($13M). CCBC YTD gains are higher at: 23.333 vs. FBMS (19.103). CCBC has less debt than FBMS: CCBC (3.09M) vs FBMS (132M). FBMS has higher revenues than CCBC: FBMS (290M) vs CCBC (5.07M).
CCBCFBMSCCBC / FBMS
Capitalization13M797M2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.33319.103122%
P/E RatioN/A10.68-
Revenue5.07M290M2%
Total CashN/A122M-
Total Debt3.09M132M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCBC vs FBMS: Fundamental Ratings
CCBC
FBMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4912
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3170
SMR RATING
1..100
5218
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5237
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCBC's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FBMS (66) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew similarly to FBMS’s over the last 12 months.

CCBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBMS (70) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBMS’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's SMR Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCBC (52) in the null industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CCBC (42) in the null industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to CCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CCBC (52) in the null industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to CCBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FBMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCBC has been loosely correlated with GSBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCBC jumps, then GSBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCBC
1D Price
Change %
CCBC100%
N/A
GSBX - CCBC
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CNBB - CCBC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LWCL - CCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBMS - CCBC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
FDBC - CCBC
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

FBMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBMS has been closely correlated with TRST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBMS jumps, then TRST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBMS
1D Price
Change %
FBMS100%
+0.12%
TRST - FBMS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
HBNC - FBMS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
WASH - FBMS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
SMBC - FBMS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
FRME - FBMS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
More