CCBC
Price
$13.52
Change
-$0.13 (-0.95%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
FBMS
Price
$34.06
Change
-$2.07 (-5.73%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CCBC vs FBMS

Header iconCCBC vs FBMS Comparison
Open Charts CCBC vs FBMSBanner chart's image
Chino Commercial Ban
Price$13.52
Change-$0.13 (-0.95%)
Volume$11.73K
CapitalizationN/A
First Bancshares
Price$34.06
Change-$2.07 (-5.73%)
Volume$204.76K
CapitalizationN/A
CCBC vs FBMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCBC vs. FBMS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCBC is a StrongBuy and FBMS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CCBC: $13.52 vs. FBMS: $34.06)
Brand notoriety: CCBC and FBMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCBC: 798% vs. FBMS: 173%
Market capitalization -- CCBC: $13.04M vs. FBMS: $796.94M
CCBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.04M. FBMS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $796.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFBMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FBMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCBC is a better buy in the long-term than FBMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCBC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCBC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FBMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCBC is a better buy in the short-term than FBMS.

Price Growth

CCBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while FBMS (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBMS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBMS($797M) has a higher market cap than CCBC($13M). CCBC YTD gains are higher at: 28.762 vs. FBMS (20.279). CCBC has less debt than FBMS: CCBC (3.09M) vs FBMS (132M). FBMS has higher revenues than CCBC: FBMS (290M) vs CCBC (5.07M).
CCBCFBMSCCBC / FBMS
Capitalization13M797M2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.76220.279142%
P/E RatioN/A10.68-
Revenue5.07M290M2%
Total CashN/A122M-
Total Debt3.09M132M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCBC vs FBMS: Fundamental Ratings
CCBC
FBMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6865
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2971
SMR RATING
1..100
5018
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2818
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCBC's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as FBMS (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew similarly to FBMS’s over the last 12 months.

CCBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBMS (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBMS’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's SMR Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CCBC (50) in the null industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to CCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CCBC (44) in the null industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to CCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CCBC (28) in the null industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to CCBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCBCFBMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTNSX11.33-0.24
-2.12%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq S
RGIVX12.22-0.34
-2.71%
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Inc I
RWMGX63.98-1.88
-2.85%
American Funds Washington Mutual R6
NESNX61.00-2.03
-3.22%
Natixis US Equity Opportunities N
BRWCX23.69-0.80
-3.27%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq C

CCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCBC has been loosely correlated with GSBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCBC jumps, then GSBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCBC
1D Price
Change %
CCBC100%
-0.95%
GSBX - CCBC
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CNBB - CCBC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LWCL - CCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBMS - CCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.73%
HIFS - CCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.62%
More

FBMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBMS has been closely correlated with TRST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBMS jumps, then TRST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBMS
1D Price
Change %
FBMS100%
-5.73%
TRST - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
-5.72%
FRME - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
-5.87%
WASH - FBMS
82%
Closely correlated
-8.80%
HFWA - FBMS
82%
Closely correlated
-6.43%
IBCP - FBMS
82%
Closely correlated
-4.93%
More