CCBC
Price
$16.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
51.39M
HIFS
Price
$290.27
Change
-$3.77 (-1.28%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
641.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCBC vs HIFS

Header iconCCBC vs HIFS Comparison
Open Charts CCBC vs HIFSBanner chart's image
Chino Commercial Ban
Price$16.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization51.39M
Hingham Institution for Savings
Price$290.27
Change-$3.77 (-1.28%)
Volume$200
Capitalization641.37M
CCBC vs HIFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCBC vs. HIFS commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCBC is a StrongBuy and HIFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CCBC: $16.00 vs. HIFS: $294.04)
Brand notoriety: CCBC and HIFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCBC: 14% vs. HIFS: 82%
Market capitalization -- CCBC: $51.39M vs. HIFS: $641.37M
CCBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $51.39M. HIFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $641.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHIFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HIFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCBC is a better buy in the long-term than HIFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCBC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HIFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCBC is a better buy in the short-term than HIFS.

Price Growth

CCBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.92% price change this week, while HIFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +11.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIFS($641M) has a higher market cap than CCBC($51.4M). HIFS has higher P/E ratio than CCBC: HIFS (19.14) vs CCBC (10.00). HIFS (16.579) and CCBC (16.026) have similar YTD gains . CCBC has less debt than HIFS: CCBC (3.09M) vs HIFS (1.57B). HIFS has higher revenues than CCBC: HIFS (75.9M) vs CCBC (14.9M).
CCBCHIFSCCBC / HIFS
Capitalization51.4M641M8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.02616.57997%
P/E Ratio10.0019.1452%
Revenue14.9M75.9M20%
Total CashN/A8.66M-
Total Debt3.09M1.57B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCBC vs HIFS: Fundamental Ratings
CCBC
HIFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1567
SMR RATING
1..100
5154
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2685
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCBC's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as HIFS (77) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

CCBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIFS (67) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

CCBC's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as HIFS (54) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CCBC (49) in the null industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to CCBC’s over the last 12 months.

CCBC's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIFS (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCBCHIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFCIX53.62N/A
N/A
Hennessy Focus Institutional
QGBLX10.56N/A
N/A
Quantified Global Fund Investor
DLQIX16.43N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity I
ITHTX58.06N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation R5
ASILX15.95N/A
N/A
AB Select US Long/Short I

CCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCBC has been loosely correlated with GSBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCBC jumps, then GSBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCBC
1D Price
Change %
CCBC100%
N/A
GSBX - CCBC
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
CNBB - CCBC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LWCL - CCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIFS - CCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
FDBC - CCBC
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
More

HIFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIFS has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIFS jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIFS
1D Price
Change %
HIFS100%
+1.50%
BY - HIFS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
MBWM - HIFS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
TRMK - HIFS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
SMBC - HIFS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
MCBS - HIFS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More