Ad is loading...
CCBTX vs RFJTX
CCBTX vs RFJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCBTX vs. RFJTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCBTX is a Hold and RFJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCBTX (4.74B) and RFJTX (4.74B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RFJTX pays higher dividends than CCBTX: RFJTX (3.15) vs CCBTX (1.98). CCBTX was incepted earlier than RFJTX: CCBTX (11 years) vs RFJTX (16 years). CCBTX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RFJTX (0.30). CCBTX (250) and RFJTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. CCBTX (6.23). RFJTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.68 vs. CCBTX (16.38).
| CCBTX | RFJTX | CCBTX / RFJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.30 | 457% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.30 | 457% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.070 | 2.367 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.74B | 4.74B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 3.15 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.23 | 7.41 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.99 | 11.92 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.38 | 21.68 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.38 | 27.59 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...