Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCAX vs GLPIX
CCCAX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCAX vs. GLPIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCAX is a Hold and GLPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. CCCAX (1.02B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than CCCAX: GLPIX (7.02) vs CCCAX (6.63). CCCAX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCAX (15 years) vs GLPIX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than CCCAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCAX (91.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCAX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCAX (1000). GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.96 vs. CCCAX (-1.50). GLPIX (187.89) and CCCAX (183.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCCAX | GLPIX | CCCAX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 6.74 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 6.74 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.042 | 3.011 | 1% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.59B | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.63 | 7.02 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.50 | 1.96 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.29 | 52.52 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 183.39 | 187.89 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.17 | 84.96 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement