Ad is loading...
CCCAX vs GLPIX
CCCAX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCAX vs. GLPIX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCAX is a Buy and GLPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. CCCAX (1.19B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than CCCAX: GLPIX (6.29) vs CCCAX (5.77). CCCAX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCAX (14 years) vs GLPIX (12 years). GLPIX (2.19) is less costly to investors than CCCAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCAX (47.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCAX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCAX (1000). CCCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.63 vs. GLPIX (21.17). CCCAX return over 5 years is better than : 349.67 vs. GLPIX (323.53).
| CCCAX | GLPIX | CCCAX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.19 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.19 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.146 | 8.863 | 92% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 1.77B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.77 | 6.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.63 | 21.17 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.50 | 72.27 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 349.67 | 323.53 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.43 | 35.55 | 125% |