Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCAX vs GLPIX
CCCAX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCAX vs. GLPIX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCAX is a StrongBuy and GLPIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.64B vs. CCCAX (1.06B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than CCCAX: GLPIX (6.54) vs CCCAX (6.11). CCCAX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCAX (15 years) vs GLPIX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than CCCAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCAX (91.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCAX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCAX (1000). CCCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.37 vs. GLPIX (12.39). GLPIX (192.15) and CCCAX (191.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCCAX | GLPIX | CCCAX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 6.74 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 6.74 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.684 | 3.050 | 22% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.64B | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.11 | 6.54 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.37 | 12.39 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 68.14 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 191.87 | 192.15 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.19 | 52.06 | 98% |