Ad is loading...
CCCAX vs GLPIX
CCCAX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCAX vs. GLPIX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCAX is a StrongBuy and GLPIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. CCCAX (1.08B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than CCCAX: GLPIX (6.76) vs CCCAX (6.27). CCCAX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCAX (14 years) vs GLPIX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than CCCAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCAX (47.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCAX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCAX (1000). CCCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.16 vs. GLPIX (12.23). CCCAX return over 5 years is better than : 199.51 vs. GLPIX (186.37).
| CCCAX | GLPIX | CCCAX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 6.74 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 6.74 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.067 | 0.604 | -177% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.62B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.27 | 6.76 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.16 | 12.23 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.63 | 67.29 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 199.51 | 186.37 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.95 | 23.04 | 130% |