Ad is loading...
CCCAX vs SMFPX
CCCAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCAX is a Buy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. CCCAX (1.19B). CCCAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCAX (5.64) vs SMFPX (4.75). CCCAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCAX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CCCAX (47.00). CCCAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.89 vs. SMFPX (39.53). CCCAX return over 5 years is better than : 101.15 vs. SMFPX (95.78).
| CCCAX | SMFPX | CCCAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.199 | 5.742 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 1.32B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.64 | 4.75 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.89 | 39.53 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.93 | 80.14 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.15 | 95.78 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.03 | 26.37 | 144% |