Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCAX vs SMFPX
CCCAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. CCCAX (1.02B). CCCAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCAX (6.63) vs SMFPX (3.55). CCCAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCAX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CCCAX (1.51). CCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). CCCAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.15 vs. CCCAX (-1.50). CCCAX return over 5 years is better than : 183.39 vs. SMFPX (143.68).
| CCCAX | SMFPX | CCCAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.042 | 3.154 | 1% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.24B | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.63 | 3.55 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.50 | -0.15 | 1,011% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.29 | 52.05 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 183.39 | 143.68 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.17 | 95.65 | 75% |