Ad is loading...
CCCCX vs GLPIX
CCCCX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCCX vs. GLPIX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCCX is a StrongBuy and GLPIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. CCCCX (1.08B). CCCCX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: CCCCX (7.86) vs GLPIX (6.76). CCCCX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCCX (14 years) vs GLPIX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than CCCCX (2.24). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCCX (47.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCCX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCCX (1000). CCCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. GLPIX (12.23). CCCCX (188.59) and GLPIX (186.37) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCCCX | GLPIX | CCCCX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 6.74 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 6.74 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.134 | 0.604 | -188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.62B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 6.76 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 12.23 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.36 | 67.29 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 188.59 | 186.37 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.41 | 23.04 | 89% |