Ad is loading...
CCCCX vs SMFPX
CCCCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCCX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. CCCCX (1.08B). CCCCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCCX (7.23) vs SMFPX (3.38). CCCCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCCX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). CCCCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.13). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CCCCX (47.00). CCCCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.27 vs. SMFPX (22.59). CCCCX return over 5 years is better than : 232.13 vs. SMFPX (170.05).
| CCCCX | SMFPX | CCCCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 2.13 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.13 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.926 | -2.694 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.22B | 89% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.23 | 3.38 | 214% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.27 | 22.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.41 | 41.85 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 232.13 | 170.05 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.32 | 12.72 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...