Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCCX vs SMFPX
CCCCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. CCCCX (1.02B). CCCCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCCX (8.40) vs SMFPX (3.55). CCCCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCCX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). CCCCX (2.24) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . CCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). CCCCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. CCCCX (-1.93). CCCCX return over 5 years is better than : 168.50 vs. SMFPX (142.73).
| CCCCX | SMFPX | CCCCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.15 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.158 | 3.154 | -37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.23B | 83% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.40 | 3.55 | 237% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.93 | 0.71 | -274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.57 | 52.05 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 168.50 | 142.73 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.59 | 95.65 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement