Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCCX vs SMFPX
CCCCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. CCCCX (1.08B). CCCCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCCX (7.59) vs SMFPX (3.39). CCCCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCCX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). CCCCX (2.24) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . CCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). CCCCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. SMFPX (15.70). CCCCX return over 5 years is better than : 199.10 vs. SMFPX (150.52).
| CCCCX | SMFPX | CCCCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.15 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.265 | 2.104 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.26B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.59 | 3.39 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.48 | 15.70 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.34 | 74.70 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 199.10 | 150.52 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.05 | 31.11 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement