Ad is loading...
CCCCX vs SMFPX
CCCCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. CCCCX (1.13B). CCCCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCCX (6.90) vs SMFPX (4.75). CCCCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCCX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CCCCX (47.00). CCCCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.92 vs. SMFPX (32.13). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 74.84 vs. CCCCX (70.39).
| CCCCX | SMFPX | CCCCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.081 | 31.123 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 1.21B | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.90 | 4.75 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.92 | 32.13 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.23 | 76.61 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.39 | 74.84 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.80 | 18.54 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...