Ad is loading...
CCCCX vs SMFPX
CCCCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCCX vs. SMFPX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCCX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. CCCCX (1.08B). CCCCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCCX (7.86) vs SMFPX (3.64). CCCCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCCX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). CCCCX (2.24) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CCCCX (47.00). CCCCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. SMFPX (18.08). CCCCX return over 5 years is better than : 188.59 vs. SMFPX (149.25).
| CCCCX | SMFPX | CCCCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.15 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.134 | -1.026 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.23B | 88% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 3.64 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 18.08 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.36 | 56.78 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 188.59 | 149.25 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.41 | 16.90 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...