Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCCX vs SMFPX
CCCCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. CCCCX (1.06B). CCCCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCCX (7.77) vs SMFPX (3.42). CCCCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCCX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). CCCCX (2.24) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . CCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). CCCCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCCCX (13.80) and SMFPX (13.72) have marching annual gain over last year. CCCCX return over 5 years is better than : 202.35 vs. SMFPX (154.53).
| CCCCX | SMFPX | CCCCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.15 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.461 | 3.086 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.25B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.77 | 3.42 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.80 | 13.72 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.17 | 57.39 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 202.35 | 154.53 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.22 | 55.36 | 78% |