Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCCX vs SPMGX
CCCCX vs SPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCCX vs. SPMGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCCX is a Hold and SPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMGX (1.07B) and CCCCX (1.07B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CCCCX pays higher dividends than SPMGX: CCCCX (7.77) vs SPMGX (5.61). CCCCX was incepted earlier than SPMGX: CCCCX (15 years) vs SPMGX (6 years). SPMGX (3.36) is less costly to investors than CCCCX (2.24). SPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CCCCX (91.00). CCCCX (1000) and SPMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.73 vs. SPMGX (13.99). SPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 252.12 vs. CCCCX (204.81).
| CCCCX | SPMGX | CCCCX / SPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 3.36 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 3.36 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.279 | 2.572 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 1.07B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.77 | 5.61 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.73 | 13.99 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.46 | 77.83 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 204.81 | 252.12 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement