CCCS
Price
$9.34
Change
+$0.11 (+1.19%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.08B
90 days until earnings call
NDATF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Updated
May 5 closing price
Capitalization
450.71K
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCCS vs NDATF

Header iconCCCS vs NDATF Comparison
Open Charts CCCS vs NDATFBanner chart's image
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings
Price$9.34
Change+$0.11 (+1.19%)
Volume$6.17M
Capitalization6.08B
NDATALYZE
Price$0.01
Change-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Volume$19.35K
Capitalization450.71K
CCCS vs NDATF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCCS vs. NDATF commentary
Aug 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCS is a Hold and NDATF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CCCS: $9.34 vs. NDATF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: CCCS and NDATF are both not notable
CCCS represents the Packaged Software, while NDATF is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCCS: 82% vs. NDATF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CCCS: $6.08B vs. NDATF: $450.71K
CCCS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $6.08B. NDATF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $450.71K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $336.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $45.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCCS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNDATF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NDATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCCS is a better buy in the long-term than NDATF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDATF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NDATF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDATF is a better buy in the short-term than CCCS.

Price Growth

CCCS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.32% price change this week, while NDATF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.14%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCCS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.42% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.48% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCCS($6.08B) has a higher market cap than NDATF($451K). CCCS YTD gains are higher at: -20.375 vs. NDATF (-81.833). CCCS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 198M vs. NDATF (-469.05K). CCCS has more cash in the bank: 55.1M vs. NDATF (499K). CCCS has higher revenues than NDATF: CCCS (997M) vs NDATF (887).
CCCSNDATFCCCS / NDATF
Capitalization6.08B451K1,348,780%
EBITDA198M-469.05K-42,213%
Gain YTD-20.375-81.83325%
P/E Ratio969.50N/A-
Revenue997M887112,401,353%
Total Cash55.1M499K11,042%
Total Debt1.07BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCCSNDATF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSTX1.780.11
+6.59%
OS Therapies Inc
UMBF114.554.75
+4.33%
UMB Financial Corp
UFPT219.806.24
+2.92%
UFP Technologies
API3.820.07
+1.87%
Agora
OXLCO23.250.05
+0.22%
Oxford Lane Capital Corp

CCCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCCS has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCCS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCCS
1D Price
Change %
CCCS100%
+1.19%
COIN - CCCS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
CLSK - CCCS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
DOCN - CCCS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
RIOT - CCCS
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
HSTM - CCCS
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
More

NDATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDATF has been closely correlated with NEMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDATF jumps, then NEMTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDATF
1D Price
Change %
NDATF100%
N/A
NEMTF - NDATF
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
DDOG - NDATF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
DSNY - NDATF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCCS - NDATF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
BSY - NDATF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
More