CCCS vs NDATF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCS is a Hold and NDATF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCCS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDATF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NDATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCCS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDATF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NDATF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CCCS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.90% price change this week, while NDATF (@Packaged Software) price change was -43.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCCS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.15% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CCCS | NDATF | CCCS / NDATF | |
| Capitalization | 7.13B | 3.51M | 203,481% |
| EBITDA | 114M | -1.02M | -11,227% |
| Gain YTD | -4.518 | -43.000 | 11% |
| P/E Ratio | 256.41 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 866M | 122K | 709,836% |
| Total Cash | 196M | 673K | 29,123% |
| Total Debt | 833M | N/A | - |
| CCCS | NDATF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 67% | 12 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 7% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 8% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 60% | 12 days ago 12% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 56% | 12 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 61% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 56% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 58% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MGC | 216.45 | 2.47 | +1.15% |
| Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | |||
| TDVG | 40.57 | 0.16 | +0.40% |
| T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| BSMR | 23.64 | 0.07 | +0.29% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2027 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| EQRR | 59.57 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | |||
| DYLD | 22.51 | -0.06 | -0.27% |
| LeaderShares® Dynamic Yield ETF | |||
CCCS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCCS has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCCS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCCS | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| COIN - CCCS | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.92% | ||
| CLSK - CCCS | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.17% | ||
| RIOT - CCCS | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| AVDX - CCCS | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| DH - CCCS | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||
NDATF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDATF has been closely correlated with NEMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDATF jumps, then NEMTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDATF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDATF | 100% | +139.16% | ||
| NEMTF - NDATF | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| DDOG - NDATF | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| DSNY - NDATF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCCS - NDATF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| BSY - NDATF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
More | ||||