CCDBF
Price
$59.16
Change
+$0.23 (+0.39%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
10.27B
HOYFF
Price
$35.40
Change
-$1.08 (-2.96%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCDBF vs HOYFF

Header iconCCDBF vs HOYFF Comparison
Open Charts CCDBF vs HOYFFBanner chart's image
CCL Industries
Price$59.16
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
Volume$4.39K
Capitalization10.27B
Huhtamaki Oy
Price$35.40
Change-$1.08 (-2.96%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.7B
CCDBF vs HOYFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCDBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOYFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCDBF vs. HOYFF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCDBF is a Hold and HOYFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CCDBF: $59.16 vs. HOYFF: $35.40)
Brand notoriety: CCDBF and HOYFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCDBF: 22% vs. HOYFF: 14%
Market capitalization -- CCDBF: $10.27B vs. HOYFF: $3.7B
CCDBF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $10.27B. HOYFF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $3.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCDBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHOYFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCDBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HOYFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCDBF is a better buy in the long-term than HOYFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCDBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOYFF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCDBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HOYFF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCDBF is a better buy in the short-term than HOYFF.

Price Growth

CCDBF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while HOYFF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+2.82% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCDBF($10.3B) has a higher market cap than HOYFF($3.7B). CCDBF has higher P/E ratio than HOYFF: CCDBF (18.37) vs HOYFF (16.01). CCDBF YTD gains are higher at: 15.423 vs. HOYFF (-9.567). CCDBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.61B vs. HOYFF (633M). CCDBF has more cash in the bank: 962M vs. HOYFF (444M). HOYFF has less debt than CCDBF: HOYFF (1.77B) vs CCDBF (2.6B). CCDBF has higher revenues than HOYFF: CCDBF (7.48B) vs HOYFF (4.09B).
CCDBFHOYFFCCDBF / HOYFF
Capitalization10.3B3.7B278%
EBITDA1.61B633M254%
Gain YTD15.423-9.567-161%
P/E Ratio18.3716.01115%
Revenue7.48B4.09B183%
Total Cash962M444M217%
Total Debt2.6B1.77B147%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCDBF vs HOYFF: Fundamental Ratings
CCDBF
HOYFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
5367
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5275
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6341
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOYFF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as CCDBF (50). This means that HOYFF’s stock grew similarly to CCDBF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOYFF (100). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOYFF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as HOYFF (67). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew similarly to HOYFF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as HOYFF (75). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew similarly to HOYFF’s over the last 12 months.

HOYFF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CCDBF (63). This means that HOYFF’s stock grew similarly to CCDBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCDBFHOYFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCDBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOYFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIS95.120.53
+0.56%
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
FDLS34.150.15
+0.44%
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
ITDI35.920.05
+0.13%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2065 ETF
IBGL24.09-0.03
-0.12%
iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Trsy ETF
VRP24.50-0.08
-0.33%
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF

CCDBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCDBF and AVY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCDBF and AVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCDBF
1D Price
Change %
CCDBF100%
+0.39%
AVY - CCDBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
AMCCF - CCDBF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGX - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-33.17%
HOYFF - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HXGCF - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HOYFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HOYFF and TCLAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOYFF and TCLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOYFF
1D Price
Change %
HOYFF100%
N/A
TCLAF - HOYFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRVWF - HOYFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HXGCF - HOYFF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJSF - HOYFF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFLXF - HOYFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More