CCDBF
Price
$57.01
Change
-$0.18 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
9.1B
HOYFF
Price
$37.34
Change
+$2.08 (+5.90%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCDBF vs HOYFF

Header iconCCDBF vs HOYFF Comparison
Open Charts CCDBF vs HOYFFBanner chart's image
CCL Industries
Price$57.01
Change-$0.18 (-0.31%)
Volume$34.61K
Capitalization9.1B
Huhtamaki Oy
Price$37.34
Change+$2.08 (+5.90%)
Volume$2.73K
Capitalization3.72B
CCDBF vs HOYFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCDBF vs. HOYFF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCDBF is a Hold and HOYFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCDBF: $57.01 vs. HOYFF: $37.34)
Brand notoriety: CCDBF and HOYFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCDBF: 25% vs. HOYFF: 383%
Market capitalization -- CCDBF: $9.1B vs. HOYFF: $3.72B
CCDBF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $9.1B. HOYFF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $3.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCDBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHOYFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCDBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HOYFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCDBF is a better buy in the long-term than HOYFF.

Price Growth

CCDBF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -2.21% price change this week, while HOYFF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+1.43% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCDBF($9.1B) has a higher market cap than HOYFF($3.72B). CCDBF has higher P/E ratio than HOYFF: CCDBF (23.44) vs HOYFF (14.77). CCDBF YTD gains are higher at: 11.228 vs. HOYFF (-4.606). CCDBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.25B vs. HOYFF (590M). CCDBF has more cash in the bank: 765M vs. HOYFF (334M). HOYFF has less debt than CCDBF: HOYFF (1.81B) vs CCDBF (2.28B). CCDBF has higher revenues than HOYFF: CCDBF (6.65B) vs HOYFF (4.38B).
CCDBFHOYFFCCDBF / HOYFF
Capitalization9.1B3.72B244%
EBITDA1.25B590M212%
Gain YTD11.228-4.606-244%
P/E Ratio23.4414.77159%
Revenue6.65B4.38B152%
Total Cash765M334M229%
Total Debt2.28B1.81B126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCDBF vs HOYFF: Fundamental Ratings
CCDBF
HOYFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8849
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
5160
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8582
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOYFF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CCDBF (54). This means that HOYFF’s stock grew similarly to CCDBF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HOYFF (100). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew significantly faster than HOYFF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as HOYFF (60). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew similarly to HOYFF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as HOYFF (56). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew similarly to HOYFF’s over the last 12 months.

HOYFF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CCDBF (85). This means that HOYFF’s stock grew similarly to CCDBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSCOX9.51N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Inception C
LZUOX16.63N/A
N/A
Lazard US Equity Focus Open
HRCAX110.98N/A
N/A
Harbor Capital Appreciation Admin
MXINX14.67N/A
N/A
Empower International Index Inv
BIVIX17.04N/A
N/A
Invenomic Institutional

CCDBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCDBF and AVY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCDBF and AVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCDBF
1D Price
Change %
CCDBF100%
-0.31%
AVY - CCDBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
AMCCF - CCDBF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGX - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOYFF - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HXGCF - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HOYFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HOYFF and TCLAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOYFF and TCLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOYFF
1D Price
Change %
HOYFF100%
N/A
TCLAF - HOYFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
GRVWF - HOYFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HXGCF - HOYFF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJSF - HOYFF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFLXF - HOYFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More