CCDBF
Price
$59.52
Change
+$1.57 (+2.71%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.1B
HXGCF
Price
$1.71
Change
-$0.09 (-5.00%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
607.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCDBF vs HXGCF

Header iconCCDBF vs HXGCF Comparison
Open Charts CCDBF vs HXGCFBanner chart's image
CCL Industries
Price$59.52
Change+$1.57 (+2.71%)
Volume$44.59K
Capitalization9.1B
Hexagon Composites ASA
Price$1.71
Change-$0.09 (-5.00%)
Volume$5.55K
Capitalization607.54M
CCDBF vs HXGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCDBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCDBF vs. HXGCF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCDBF is a Hold and HXGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CCDBF: $59.52 vs. HXGCF: $1.71)
Brand notoriety: CCDBF and HXGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCDBF: 46% vs. HXGCF: 166%
Market capitalization -- CCDBF: $9.1B vs. HXGCF: $607.54M
CCDBF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $9.1B. HXGCF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $607.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCDBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHXGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCDBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HXGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCDBF is a better buy in the long-term than HXGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCDBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HXGCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCDBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HXGCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCDBF is a better buy in the short-term than HXGCF.

Price Growth

CCDBF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +2.33% price change this week, while HXGCF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

HXGCF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.74% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCDBF($9.1B) has a higher market cap than HXGCF($608M). CCDBF YTD gains are higher at: 16.119 vs. HXGCF (-56.709). CCDBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.25B vs. HXGCF (9.5M). CCDBF has higher revenues than HXGCF: CCDBF (6.65B) vs HXGCF (5B).
CCDBFHXGCFCCDBF / HXGCF
Capitalization9.1B608M1,497%
EBITDA1.25B9.5M13,135%
Gain YTD16.119-56.709-28%
P/E Ratio23.44N/A-
Revenue6.65B5B133%
Total Cash765MN/A-
Total Debt2.28BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCDBF vs HXGCF: Fundamental Ratings
CCDBF
HXGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8927
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
5196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4863
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
844
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCDBF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGCF (84). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew similarly to HXGCF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HXGCF (100). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HXGCF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HXGCF (96). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HXGCF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGCF (63). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew similarly to HXGCF’s over the last 12 months.

HXGCF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCDBF (84). This means that HXGCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CCDBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCDBFHXGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCDBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFMIX17.18N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Next Gen Em Mkts I
GCCSX32.32N/A
N/A
Gabelli Small Cap Growth C
JCVSX24.80N/A
N/A
JHancock Classic Value R2
ESMSX17.55N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV Euro Small Company R6
MKVGX15.90N/A
N/A
MFS International Large Cap Value R4

CCDBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCDBF and AVY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCDBF and AVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCDBF
1D Price
Change %
CCDBF100%
+2.70%
AVY - CCDBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
AMCCF - CCDBF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGX - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOYFF - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HXGCF - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HXGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HXGCF and HOYFF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HXGCF and HOYFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HXGCF
1D Price
Change %
HXGCF100%
N/A
HOYFF - HXGCF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRVWF - HXGCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CADNF - HXGCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJSF - HXGCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCDBF - HXGCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
More