Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCDTX vs FSNPX
CCDTX vs FSNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCDTX vs. FSNPX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCDTX is a Hold and FSNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.4B vs. FSNPX (19.4B). FSNPX pays higher dividends than CCDTX: FSNPX (2.37) vs CCDTX (1.68). CCDTX was incepted earlier than FSNPX: CCDTX (11 years) vs FSNPX (8 years). CCDTX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FSNPX (0.52). FSNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. CCDTX (10.00). FSNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCDTX: FSNPX (0) vs CCDTX (250). CCDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. FSNPX (5.16). CCDTX return over 5 years is better than : 18.84 vs. FSNPX (15.31).
| CCDTX | FSNPX | CCDTX / FSNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.52 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.52 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.274 | 3.742 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.4B | 19.4B | 167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 2.37 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 5.16 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.34 | 23.81 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.84 | 15.31 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement