Ad is loading...
CCDTX vs FSNPX
CCDTX vs FSNPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCDTX vs. FSNPX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCDTX is a Hold and FSNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.1B vs. FSNPX (19.3B). FSNPX pays higher dividends than CCDTX: FSNPX (2.42) vs CCDTX (1.72). CCDTX was incepted earlier than FSNPX: CCDTX (11 years) vs FSNPX (8 years). CCDTX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FSNPX (0.53). FSNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. CCDTX (10.00). FSNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCDTX: FSNPX (0) vs CCDTX (250). FSNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. CCDTX (6.91). CCDTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.45 vs. FSNPX (18.69).
| CCDTX | FSNPX | CCDTX / FSNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.53 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.53 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.028 | 2.057 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.1B | 19.3B | 166% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 2.42 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.91 | 7.66 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.73 | 10.12 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.45 | 18.69 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers