It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EHC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CCEL (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +4.23% price change this week, while EHC (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +4.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.61%.
CCEL is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2025.
EHC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
CCEL | EHC | CCEL / EHC | |
Capitalization | 61.8M | 8.27B | 1% |
EBITDA | 6.98M | 1.03B | 1% |
Gain YTD | -0.134 | 2.777 | -5% |
P/E Ratio | 16.37 | 23.18 | 71% |
Revenue | 31.2M | 4.8B | 1% |
Total Cash | 1.21M | 69.1M | 2% |
Total Debt | 12.5M | 2.93B | 0% |
CCEL | EHC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCEL's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as EHC (41) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that CCEL’s stock grew similarly to EHC’s over the last 12 months.
EHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEL (80) in the null industry. This means that EHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCEL’s over the last 12 months.
CCEL's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as EHC (40) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that CCEL’s stock grew similarly to EHC’s over the last 12 months.
CCEL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as EHC (47) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that CCEL’s stock grew similarly to EHC’s over the last 12 months.
CCEL's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as EHC (44) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that CCEL’s stock grew similarly to EHC’s over the last 12 months.
CCEL | EHC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago79% | 12 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago82% | 12 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago84% | 12 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago72% | 12 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago78% | 17 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago89% | 12 days ago57% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
REMX | 42.84 | 0.44 | +1.04% |
VanEck Rare Earth & Strat Mtls ETF | |||
XB | 39.63 | 0.20 | +0.51% |
BondBloxx B Rated USD Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
VTWV | 147.16 | 0.53 | +0.36% |
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | |||
UMAR | 36.10 | 0.09 | +0.24% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Mar | |||
SCHO | 24.17 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
Schwab Short-Term US Treasury ETF™ |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCEL and NWKHY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCEL and NWKHY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CCEL | 100% | +5.12% | ||
NWKHY - CCEL | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NHC - CCEL | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
EHC - CCEL | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
TOI - CCEL | 11% Poorly correlated | +13.40% | ||
BDUUY - CCEL | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EHC has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EHC jumps, then THC could also see price increases.